The Realist Report – Sinead McCarthy & Zan Overall

Trump Make America Great Again 2

On this edition of The Realist Report broadcast live on Renegade Broadcasting, we’re joined by two special guests. Sinead McCarthy, a fellow host here on the network, joined me during the first hour to discuss a number of topics, including the NPI conference in Washington, D.C. that I will be attending tomorrow, the Alt Right, Donald Trump, and productive strategies to advance the pro-White cause and message. During the second hour, my good friend Zan Overall joined me to discuss his recent activism, the importance of 9/11 Truth and historical revisionism, and Donald Trump. This is one show you do not want to miss!

Below are relevant links for this program:

Subscribe to The Realist Report today, and support pro-White independent media!

Donate to The Realist Report – $10 goes a long way! Enter your email below and follow the prompt.


  • John? What’s happening with John Kaminski? I heard about the blow-up he had with
    Renegade, over an article he wrote in relation to a video about how racially disloyal women are helping to destroy the White West.

    I hope can invite him on your show and let us hear his side of the story.

    • The name of the video in question is ‘Why Women Destroy Nations/Civilizations’ (How Women… would be a more accurate title), by Black Pigeon.

      The 18 minute video is very interesting (more than interesting and short of fascinating). I think it is very true and accurate. I viewed it on The owner of the site backpedals on his original statement that it accurate (somewhat? mostly?) (but nations are mostly destroyed by jews) in a follow-up post because apparently the video pissed off several of his women readers. (John F., you may not want to post this video for the same reason.) In a later post, northerntruthseeker claims it is, or likely is, a jew dividing the aware people/readers out in the cyberworld. That could be. I don’t know anything about Black Pigeon.

      This video is most certainly worth watching.

      I wouldn’t care if a million ‘feminists’ were trying to shout me down, the video is accurate! With respect to disgruntled women who view the video, I say, file under: The Truth Hurts!

      • “In a later post, northerntruthseeker claims it is, or likely is, a jew dividing the aware people/readers out in the cyberworld. ”

        Or may be a jew.

        I strongly dislike being misquoted and do not want to misquote anyone else.

  • Here is a link for the three of you (and your fans) to a recent article on the evils of the H 1 B Visa. I’m hoping you three will add this topic to your discussions in the near future.

  • I have only voted for a U.S. president two times in the last three decades and that was for Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot. Just as Dr. David Duke said that he does not endorse Trump but he likes his views on immigration and the economy. Is Trump going to turn our country around? Probably not, but it may be a tiny first step.
    And Sinead, I don’t think people are any less active about getting the word out about Jews and people actually may even be more active considering the Jews in the RNC and the media attacking Trump! This may be the ultimate time to point this out to our friends and neighbors if they haven’t already figured this out for themselves!

  • Why do you guys keep using the word “gay” when you talk about sodomite perverts? It seems you are trying to excuse their sick perversions. Call a spade a spade and use sodomite or lesbian.

    • How about people who just give themselves enemas every day or every other day for health reasons? Would you call them “sodomite” perverts too for just doing what their doctor recommended? lol I mean, hey, they too are sticking things up where the sun don’t shine, right? Or would they have to intend the action in a certain way or “enjoy” the act so that the word “pervert” can be used? lol How about a “cavity search” in an airport (yes, many countries, such as Ukraine, now will not allow you to enter without a full cavity search, as in bend-over and let a complete stranger stick a finger up where criminals hide things) or police station. Does that make you or the “cavity searching” security officer or policeman sodomites? lol It would to certain ways of thinking, but not to mine.

      Pervert = Pre-inverted, it’s more in the mind and in the intentions than in any particular act in itself. Perversions are usually “the forbidden fruit” but also “the unwanted fruit.” To a heterosexual pervert, “oral sex” with a man would be far more perverted than “sodomite” sex with a woman, but the former he would never want while the latter he might sometimes be into into. To a nun or a priest or any traditionally religious person, all heterosexuals who engage in the “sick perversions” of oral sex are total degenerates too, not just homosexuals. Or sometimes even if they use any sexual positions other than the “missionary.” The homosexuals are considered sick perverts just for being homosexual, while the heteros are considered “sick perverts” if they engage in any “disgusting” and “unnatural” acts such as oral sex.

      In the 1930s USA, there was a test done and they found out that 70% of the people who visited prostitutes at that time were married men who only asked for “blow-jobs,” not even full intercourse. In those days most “wives” did not engage in that perverted act, only prostitutes did. Nowadays, even kids in junior high-school are much more likely to get oral sex from their girlfriends before they get any full-intercourse. Calling them all a bunch of “dirty perverts” for enjoying a “penis massage” would be ridiculous. It’s all about the intentions

      How about people who kiss their dogs on the mouth or let their dog lick them all over the face and mouth? How many have you seen? Hundreds? Would you call these people filthy and perverted? I sure would, since that dog’s nose and mouth are in more dirty places in one day than any “normal” human being’s nose goes in a year, although there is nothing sexual involved in kissing a dog on the lips. I think it’s disgusting and as filthy as can be. But is it “perverted”? I don’t think so. To be “pre-inverted” there would have to be sexual intent or some “un-natural” motivation for the act.

      • I agree with you on the issue of people who let their dogs lick them on their mouth and face.

        And, I am the world’s biggest fan of dogs and cannot imagine life without having one in it.

        I do realize, from my experiences with dogs, that they consider licking their owners as a sign of affection and it is their way of showing their love and devotion. And, I am cool with that – but, as for the location of those dog kisses – my leg or my hand or my arm is a far better and less unappealing place for that kind of affection.

  • “I think that one should view with philosophic admiration the strange paths of the libido and should investigate the purposes of its circuitous ways.” — CARL JUNG, Psychology of the Unconscious

    “Sex: a sweet poison only to the withered, but to the lion-willed the great cordial and the reverently reserved wine of wines.” ~ FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE, Thus Spoke Zarathustra

    “The discussion of the sexual problem is only a somewhat crude prelude to a far deeper question, and that is the question of the psychological relationship between the sexes. In comparison with this the other pales into insignificance, and with it we enter the real domain of woman. Woman’s psychology is founded on the principle of Eros, the great binder and loosener, whereas from ancient times the ruling principle ascribed to man is Logos.” – Carl Jung, “Woman in Europe”

    “The great problems of life — sexuality, of course, among others — are always related to the primordial images of the collective unconscious. These images are really balancing or compensating factors which correspond with the problems life presents in actuality. This is not to be marvelled at, since these images are deposits representing the accumulated experience of thousands of years of struggle for adaptation and existence.”
    ~ Carl Jung, Psychological Types, or, The Psychology of Individuation

    “The erotic instinct is something questionable, and will always be so whatever a future set of laws may have to say on the matter. It belongs, on the one hand, to the original animal nature of man, which will exist as long as man has an animal body. On the other hand, it is connected with the highest forms of the spirit. But it blooms only when the spirit and instinct are in true harmony. If one or the other aspect is missing, then an injury occurs, or at least there is a one-sided lack of balance which easily slips into the pathological. Too much of the animal disfigures the civilized human being, too much culture makes a sick animal.” – Carl Jung, The Psychology of the Unconscious

    “The word ‘sensuality’ covers a great deal. I have now come myself to use it for a certain sort of concentrated sensuousness penetrated by something more intense, more ecstatic, than is usually associated with what we call by that name. But it has been by the path of a deliberate and concentrated sensuality that I have at last found a working substitute in our natural world for that terrible other world of purely vicious—and with me always sadistic—mirages of fatal obsession. Where the fantastical puritans make their mistake is in their abuse of these harmless words “carnal,” “fleshly,” “sensual,” and all that these represent. It isn’t the senses that lead us astray, it is the one terrible nerve. It isn’t the general amorous instincts that are at fault, it is the one solitary sex-nerve, isolated from the rest of life, and projecting a demonic insatiable fever of its own, a land of fever, whose purlieus and borders are the ghastliest of all “Terres Gastees.” This isolated sex-nerve in each of us resembles my own heretical and I dare say unphilosophical and illogical conception of the first cause. Its energy can be used to created and sustain a world, or it can be used to blight and destroy a world.

    Human personality has other possibilities of cruelty. Brutality, violence, exploitation, oppression, insensitive thougtlessness and anger and malice are not I suppose necessarily sadistic. Sometimes I seem to suspect that there may be found in all these evils a faint sadistic tincture; but I certainly do encounter plenty of malicious, brutal and cruel people whom it is very difficult to accuse of sadism. In fact much of the cruelty in the world appears to me to spring from mere thoughtlessness and lack of imagination; whereas sadism is, in its inherent nature, aware, and imaginatively aware, of what it is doing.” ~ John Cowper Powys, “Autobiography”

    • Actually, in the official legal definition, the term “sodomy” also covers “oral” copulation and “bestiality”:

      Definition of Sodomy


      1. Sexual activity that involves oral or anal copulation, whether with the same or opposite sex
      2. Copulation with an animal: bestiality

  • I haven’t listened to the podcast (yet), but how and why is this sex-obsessed freak in here?
    You belong in another web site.

    • Oh really? Is that why I’ve been posting here and on John’s older site for almost 5 years now? You must be new around here. I must have over a thousand posts by now on John’s sites if you count them all.

      And by the way, John links directly to “Chateau Heartiste.” If you can’t handle a non-hypocritical discussion of sexuality, why are you here? The world of the 1950s no longer exists and it’s questionable if it ever did the way it was portrayed, it was just hidden behind a thicker and more polished brand of window-dressing BS. lol

  • Matt Forney on Red Ice Radio – 03 / 15 / 2015

    Roosh Press Conference – Washington DC – February 6, 2016

    Note: the above conference had to be held at a secret location and with bodyguards on hand because of free-speech-hating morons agitated by ignorant online bigots, SJWs and the MSM have been threatening to kill this guy and his entire family (his parents’ address was put online by the hacker group “anonymous”) just for two badly-worded lines taken out-of-context and blown-out-of-all-proportion, in this article:

    • (continued . . . )

      Roosh V (nickname of Dariush Valizadeh; not an “Ay-rab,” but an American citizen of half-Persian/half-Armenian descent, both ethnicities considered fully Aryan by Hitler & the National Socialist race researchers even if not by today’s rabble of Stormfront-&-VNN-bred “racialists”) on “The Damaging Effects of Jewish Intellectualism and Activism on Western Culture”

      In all of fundamentalist Islamic culture, there is no such thing as rape during marriage and the woman’s only recourse, should her husband force himself on her, is divorce. Does this mean “Christian culture” has all that much to be proud of? Not in my book! Why did the so-called “Christian” culture in America have laws that made it fully legal to marry off girls as young as 10 years old and 12 years in all states and even 7 years old in pedophile-central Delaware just a mere 100 years ago?

      At that same time, the Moslem country of Turkey was at a far saner 16 years old. So, basically, descendants of people who only a hundred years ago, were marrying off young girls as soon as they bled “for their own good” and sometimes even WAY before that, are now on their high-horse screaming “rapist” at Moslems. And in the case of the half-Christian / half-Moslem American PUA “Roosh,” screaming “rapist” and threatening the lives of his family (advocating collective punishment of any kind is the ultimate sign of a scoundrel) just for the exercise of his guaranteed free-speech in a thought experiment, “What If” scenario. Free speech should end only when lie-bel begins and not when somebody’s feelings are hurt as a result. People can ostracize all they want and exercise their own free-speech in return, but they cannot lie-bel a person and initiate violence against someone just for using insulting words and still pretend they care about “justice” and “taking responsibility for free choices and actions.”

      “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” ― George Orwell

      “Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.” ― Benjamin Franklin, Silence Dogood, The Busy-Body, and Early Writings

      “Until every soul is freely permitted to investigate every book, and creed, and dogma for itself, the world cannot be free. Mankind will be enslaved until there is mental grandeur enough to allow each man to have his thought and say. This earth will be a paradise when men can, upon all these questions differ, and yet grasp each other’s hands as friends. It is amazing to me that a difference of opinion upon subjects that we know nothing with certainty about, should make us hate, persecute, and despise each other. Why a difference of opinion upon predestination, or the trinity, should make people imprison and burn each other seems beyond the comprehension of man; and yet in all countries where Christians have existed, they have destroyed each other to the exact extent of their power. Why should a believer in God hate an atheist? Surely the atheist has not injured God, and surely he is human, capable of joy and pain, and entitled to all the rights of man. Would it not be far better to treat this atheist, at least, as well as he treats us?

      Christians tell me that they love their enemies, and yet all I ask is—not that they love their enemies, not that they love their friends even, but that they treat those who differ from them, with simple fairness.

      We do not wish to be forgiven, but we wish Christians to so act that we will not have to forgive them. If all will admit that all have an equal right to think, then the question is forever solved; but as long as organized and powerful churches, pretending to hold the keys of heaven and hell, denounce every person as an outcast and criminal who thinks for himself and denies their authority, the world will be filled with hatred and suffering. To hate man and worship God seems to be the sum of all the creeds.” ― Robert G. Ingersoll, Some Mistakes of Moses

      “I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an ass of yourself.” ― Oscar Wilde

      “Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.” ― John Milton, Areopagitica

  • @John

    P.S. Just for comparison, Dave Gahary of American Free Press, one of your frequent guests, is half-Persian, correct? Does that make him an Ay-rab too? lol Or maybe he would have to be half-Armenian to qualify as Ay-rab? lol

    • I don’t know what an Aryan is or what relevance that question or Christianity has here, neg.

      Roosh is not White, is a second generation invader who quite typically sees White women as racialized meat to be used for sex and otherwise manipulated, and the absolute minimum nationalist position is that he must go.

  • Shame on you John for having Sinead a psychotic mess on your show badmouthing Henrik and Lana! You did not even have the balls to cut this raging hag off. Didn’t they have you on their show? Show some respect for Henrik and his wife. Henrik has been going strong for 10 years. Sinead is a gossiping unhinged little girl. I won’t be supporting you anymore and I will be sure to let them know you published this garbage.

    • I have also not listened to this podcast yet, but you say Sinead is badmouthing Henrik and Lana?

      I cannot imagine what possible reason Sinead might have for having a beef with two of the best and brightest stars in the pro-White activist media. Lana is such an amazing breath of fresh air to our movement that most racially healthy White men would be willing to pay almost any price to meet a White female like her. Henrik is a very, very lucky guy.

      I will boost this podcast up on my listening list and find out what the controversy is all about.

      BTW: With the shortage of racially healthy White females in our movement, the LAST thing we need is to have the few who are part of our movement engaging in petty cat fights.

    • “Henrik has been going strong for 10 years” — Johan

      Henrik has been podcasting for ten years, but until very recently it was entirely conventional conspindustry fayre often hyping the imaginary threat of Nazis, nationalists, waycism and eugenics. The sudden about-face to selling conventional nationalist fayre, with oddball seasoning, eg. it’s the ‘Archons’ doing it to us, is welcome, but Sinead was on our side before RedIce was.


      Roosh and Donovan are controversial and causing splits within WN because that is what they were introduced to do.

      But down the road the controversy and splits are good.

      It’s White Nationalism or it isn’t. Roosh and Donovan aren’t. Quite apart from their other conduct, they are known not be us, make no bones about it, and so those who insist on their inclusion are betraying us.

      • I’ve worked my way through a little over half of the Sinead McCarthy interview, and while I did not appreciate the foul language that Sinead insisted on using – and felt that it detracted from her arguments, I did find myself agreeing with many of the criticisms that she leveled at the Alt Right.

        This homosexual infiltration is most certainly not in any possible way ‘healthy’ to our pro-White movement and embracing it is NOT conducive to the survival of our race, which depends upon the natural and normal propagation of healthy, heterosexual White children.

        The Alt Right (Richard Spencer) is closely aligned with the American Renaissance (Jared Taylor) publication, and I’ve noticed that the moderators at AmRen have a habit of censoring comments that the readers of AmRen might want to post that are critical of the Homosexual Agenda. I’ve had a number of attempted comments disapproved where I have pointed out the heavy and dominant jewish involvement in pushing the homosexual depravity agenda down the throats of White children – which, as any sane individual can see, is clearly part of the jewish white genocide agenda and an effort to help them reduce the births of White babies. This censorship by AmRen’s moderators adds fuel to the suspicions many have that AmRen is a controlled opposition website.

        As for Richard Spencer – my problem with him has to do with his overall personality. When he discusses issues that deal with the survival of White European people, he always seems to adopt a tone that, at least to me, suggests that he thinks the whole battle is some sort of lighthearted and slightly comical game. As if he sees himself as the designated class clown of the moment, and feels the urge to crack jokes and inject his wry sense of humor into a topic that is deadly serious and which is NOT a matter to be joked about.

        I intend to finish listening to this interview today, but from what I’ve heard so far, Sinead delivers some very valid criticisms of the Alt Right and these criticisms deserve careful consideration by everyone in the pro-White community.

      • Comb through their 10 years of archives you fool, very diverse range of topics. There is high value in talking about all they did through the years and they’ve brought thousands with them because they have thousands of listeners. You’re a moron if you cannot see the value in that and you are a fraud if you don’t support them who put their real names and faces out there attracting more and more people every show. Who are you hiding behind an avatar bitching? As if everyone is born fucking proWhite right out of the womb ready to sport a swastika.

        Sinead is a trashy hag and is irrelevant. Kyle is the closet fag. It’s why he sees gay everywhere! It must drive her mad.

  • John, say it ain’t so, you really are falling for the flat earth nonsense? I can imagine 2 jews sitting around talking about how dumb the goyim is, 1 said to the other “they are so gullible if we told them the earth is flat they would believe us”. They seem to be right, we are that dumb.

    • Ha, I think it’s an interesting topic worth exploring for those interested. I haven’t done a whole lot of research, but I support anyone who is interested in the topic and wants to talk about it, debate it, etc. Some of the arguments make sense to me, but I really can’t say I know one way or the other whether or not the earth is flat. I doubt I’ll even really get into it, at least not any time soon. Too many other more important topics to focus on.