The Realist Report – Carolyn Yeager

White World Awake

On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined once again by Carolyn Yeager. Carolyn and I begin by discussing Jürgen Graf’s latest book White World Awake! Stopping the Planned Extermination of Our Volk, recently published by The Barnes Review history magazine (subscribe today if you do not already!). We address the historical and political origins of the New World Order, and explain what it is really all about: the destruction of the nation state and unique racial/ethnic identities, leading to White genocide. Carolyn highlights some of her key findings about the book, including revealing exposés of both Jacques Attali and Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi. We wrap up by discussing Carolyn’s article “Stop Special Treatment for Jews” – a suggested way forward, and the brazen, shameless nature of Jews and their truly evil agenda.

Subscribe to The Realist Report today, and support independent media!

Did you enjoy this program? Consider donating to The Realist Report to help us continue producing podcasts. Enter your email below and donate $10 now!

 

34 comments

  • People, understand this;

    The WHITE race is the FIRST race the Jew wants taken out. For, as the obscene “holy” man ISHmael Levitts says;

    “… the apparent chip on the shoulder minorities have”

    http://www.darkmoon.me/2015/quotations-in-support-of-white-genocide/

  • Hey John,
    About the office that monitors antisemitism. The office will close this month, unless they are successful in pressuring Trump.

    Anti-Semitism monitoring office will reportedly be abandoned in July
    https://thinkprogress.org/anti-semitism-no-staff-trump-jewish-groups-hate-crimes-9e63be00d757

    As of July 1, the U.S. State Department’s office to monitor and combat anti-Semitism around the world will be unstaffed, according to reports.

    • According to this report from the Jewish Telegraph Agency, which is all about how the ADL and other religious leaders – along with virtually the entire Congress – are demanding Trump immediately appoint an envoy to combat “anti-Semitism,” the office is currently being ran by a “lone staffer” who is on a “fellowship.” The article notes that the “fellowship” officially ends at the end of July, so it sounds like there is at least someone maintaining the office. However, it is not an official envoy appointed by the president.

      It will be interesting to see if Trump eventually caves and appoints some well connected Jew to the position.

  • Thank you both. Fine program. Sounds like a book well worth having. We must imitate the Jew in being relentless. Keep on getting the truth out.

    • Hi Hank, thanks for the compliment.

      And I completely agree – we have to be relentless. We have to be fanatics. We have to keep getting the truth out and exposing the Jews as the lying scoundrels they truly are. We have to make clear we have a righteous cause based on facts and reality. It’s a relatively easy case to make, if you are educated, and frankly there is no excuse for any White person anywhere on earth to not be educated about the Jews and their White genocide agenda.

    • Hank: You are correct, it is a book worth having and I received my copy from The Barnes Review on March 18, 2017, but haven’t yet read it. I just finished reading David Irving’s book “Uprising”, which is about the 1956 uprising of the Hungarian people against the communist government controlled by the Soviet Union. My step-grandfather left Hungary in 1917 to escape the coming communist (Jewish) rule that Admiral Horthy tossed out shortly after.

  • I think that Graf is a holohoaxer. He says that the reign of Hitler was one of the saddest period in the history of Europe. He says that the Einsatzgruppen murdered a huge number of jews without any reason. He says that Sanning is wrong and there were much more jewish ophers of the Holohoax. He says that You cannot count the losses and many died already on the way to East. He believes in fake documents. I have never believed that the document from the Russian War archive is genuine in their book about Belzec. I think that the conditions in the transports were good and this all is jewish propaganda. The deportations of Stalin were much more harsh.

    Graf is lying also about the Ukraine. He is whitewashing Putin and Stalin too.

    • Repe –
      If you’re going to claim that Graf said these things (put into your words), you need to give an exact quote and tell us where each can be found. Otherwise, it is defamation.

      • I have read the book (Geplante Volkstod). You have said that You have not read the whole book yet. Check the chapter about holohoax. And You said clearly that You had not read the chapter about the Ukraine.

        But the main revisionists are all holohoaxers. The germans are “the bad guys” for them. They are not objective. They accept every new bullshit-document from hoaxers-how stupid they may be. Usually they afterwards have debunked them all.
        S.316: “Eine grosse Zahl von Juden wurde an der Ostfront erschossen..
        S. 317: “Ohne Furcht vor Widerlegung lässt sich aber folgendes festhalten: Der Grund für die Judenerschiessungen lag darin, dass die Nationalsozialistendie sowjetischenJuden als “Träger des Bolschewismus” betrachteten. In der Tat waren die Oktoberrevolution und der Terror der ersten Revolutionsjahre in grossem Umfang das Werk von Juden gewesen, doch nach Stalins Machtübernahme wurde das Sowjetsystem immer stärker russifiziert. Die Juden spielten in de USSR weiterhin eine äusserst wichtige Rolle, doch von einer Dominanz konnte ab der dreissiger Jahren nicht mehr die Rede sein. Die Tötungsaktionen brachten den deutschen Truppen denn auch keinerlei militärischen Vorteile. 2: Die in der Holocaust-Literatur behaupteten Opferzahlen…entsprechen nicht die Realität. Die Zahl der von den Deutschen un ihren Helfern erschossenen sowjetischen Juden dürfte sich vermutlich in der Grössenordnung von 300 000 bewegt haben (Endnote: Im Kampf gefallene jüdische Rotarmisten und Partisanen sowie bei Bombardierungen, Evakuierungen etc. umgekommene sowjetische Juden sind in dieser Zahl nicht berücksichtigt, da ihr Tod nichts mit ihrer Abstammung oder Religion zu tun hatte.).

        Was den europäischen Juden unter der nationalsozialistischen Herrschaft tatsächlich widerfuhr, ist ein trauriges Kapitel der deutschen und europäischen Geschichte, jedoch gwiss nichts weltgesichtlich Einzigartiges”

        315: Ab Ende 1941 wurde ein grosser Teil der europäischen Juden ihres Besitzes beraubt und in Konzentrationslager und Ghettos deportiert. Manche von ihnen starb noch vor Erreichen ihrer Bestimmungsorte; so erstickten im September 1942 rund 2000 Juden in einem überfüllten Deportationszug nach Belzec(Endnote: Militärarchiv der Russischen Föderatiomn, Moskau 1323-2-292b, S. 61 ff, Dokument zitiert in: Mattogno Carlo:Belzec (Repe: That unbelieveable story). “

        • These half-revisionists like these holocaust-revisionists or german revisionists (Scheil, Post etc) believe in the Einsatz-reports (Judenerschiessungen). It is not surprising, that the guest of Putin, J. Graf, also presents putinist propaganda. He sounds just like Simon Wiesenthal, when he declares the lithuanians, the estonians or the ukrainians to have murdered a large number of jews without any reason and military benefit. “The documents” prove f.e. that some important lithuanian refugees and politicians are “nazi-criminals” (serving the SS-police that killed partisans). But this is not true. How nice for the bolsheviks and Putin’s Russia that there is that terrible holocaust in the East. But in reality, only the jewish bolsheviks murdered people and very much. For Example, on tne firts days of the war, hundreds of thousands of political prisoners and their children.

          And of course, Stalin has starved only a couple of millions of ukrainians to death in the 30’s. Graf’s mouth is Putin’s mouth.

        • Thanks for this, Repe. Although I cannot actually find any of the quotes you’ve given in my book so it’s not much help. My page numbers are not the same as yours since English takes up less space than German, so I’ve had to use Googletranslate and the translations are not right.

          I said on the program I DID read the whole chapter on holohoax – “The Foundation of the New World Order” – and there were a few things I disagreed with (and one error related to Elie Wiesel) but they didn’t seem important enough, in the whole scheme of things, to waste program time on. It’s true, the main revisionists are very careful to appear non-political and “objective” in their approach, so we often think they are too soft on the Jews. I have complained about this myself. But to call them “holohoaxers” is extreme and wrong since we wouldn’t have all the knowledge we have without them … and they have worked very hard and risked their freedom to discover and publish it.

          They are right to “accept every new bullshit-document” at first and study it before they debunk it in the proper way. You admit they do usually debunk them. I didn’t find that Graf says “Sanning is wrong” and you don’t point it out. In fact none of your accusations are actually in the book in the way you state them.
          But this is what you object to:

          S.316: “A large number of Jews were shot on the eastern front.”

          — They have read all the microfilm in the Russian archives and they don’t think they can say otherwise and remain credible. It doesn’t bother me; why does it bother you? I don’t blame the Germans for shooting lots of Jews and in fact I would blame them if they didn’t. It is up to some of the rest of us to put it all into perspective.

          P. 317: “… the October Revolution and the terror of the first years of revolution had been largely the work of Jews, but after Stalin’s takeover, the Soviet system became more and more Russified. The Jews continued to play an extremely important role in the USSR, but there was no longer any dominance from the 1930s onwards. The killings did not bring any military advantages to the German troops.”

          — Not what I would write. Graf is pro-Russia, but no more than he is pro-Germany. He wants cooperation between the two. I only learned this during the Ukraine “revolution.” He also dedicates the book to his mother Valentina Ivanovna (?!) so I guess she is Russian. His father was born in the German Ruhr district. I’m not sure what that last sentence refers to, are you?

          2: The victims’ numbers claimed in the Holocaust literature … do not correspond to reality. The number of Soviet Jews who were shot by the Germans and their helpers was probably on the order of 300,000.

          — That’s a far cry from a million, right? But he doesn’t say they were shot “without any reason” as you claimed.

          “What [happened to] European Jewry [in] the nationalsocialist domination is a sad chapter in German and European history, but nothing uniquely unique in the world .”

          — You accused him of: “He says that the reign of Hitler was one of the saddest period[s] in the history of Europe.” But that’s not what he said. Graf is a moralist, I discovered in reading this book, and he really does disapprove of Hitler’s methods but not of his aims. I do not, but I respect Graf’s right to feel that way because of all the good he has done. I would not know anything if it wasn’t for people like him.

          315: “From the end of 1941 a large part of the European Jews were robbed of their possessions and deported to concentration camps and ghettoes. Some of them died before reaching their destination; In September 1942 some 2,000 Jews were suffocated in a crowded deportation train to Belzec (Endnote: Military Archives of the Russian Federation, Moscow, 1323-2-292b, p. 61 ff.). ”

          — Okay, this is taken from a Soviet document; at least he tells us that. I can’t tell if he is agreeing with this or not. If so, well, things CAN go wrong sometimes and it’s possible that could have happened.

          I have since read the chapter on Ukraine. I thought it was balanced. I know you’re anti-Russia, as I HAD been (not so much now) and don’t feel he was whitewashing anything. You don’t give any examples.
          So really, you haven’t backed up your insults against Graf.

          • I am not completely anti-Russia. There was much good in the old days. In fact, the Finnish national movement was born when Finland was a part of the imperium. We could built our country and we had autonomy and our own parlament (By 1809 in paper, from 1864 in reality). Putin and Jeltsin have created another Soviet Union.

            I think Graf’s opinion about the millions of the Ukrainians Stalin killed is wrong.

            The claims about the murdered jews bother me because I don’t believe them. I want the truth. I think killing jews was a part of the partisan-war. They were killed when the crimes of the partisans had to be punished. They were partisans and captives or they were killed in the punishments. The killings were done according the international laws and pacts. And the germans shot the criminal officials of the criminal state. The germans did not commit war crimes. They punished severly criminals who had stolen or murdered people without orders from a commander of a bataillon or higher officer. The killings were beneficial military.

            The matter is very important, because the accusations are very serious and Graf, Putin and the russians (and Wiesenthal etc.) have made them against estonians, latvians and lithuanians and ukrainians too. Of course it is as serious as if the accusations had been made only against the Germans. The Waffen SS has been accused too (Funny thing: Why don’t they have done it towards us and the norwegians, The SS-Wiking? I think there was some political calculations…)

            I cannot believe in the partisan-reports. The russians have had plenty of time for the forgeries. I think many facts are contradicting the “documents”. The jews were deported to the camps because otherwise they were spying and they usually joined the partisans. We finns did the same to the russian civilians in the East-Karelia.

            I cannot find the mention of Sanning. Maybe I have to read again the whole book. But if I can remember Graf said that it is impossible to count the the losses of the jews. I think also that his opinion is different from that of Sanning’s.

          • Repe – I think you may be reading things into the book from prior disagreements you may have had with Graf. He wrote very little about Stalin in the Ukraine chapter, and did not ever defend him.

            Graf wrote at the beginning of the Ukraine chapter: “Among the most blatant lies of the globalists is that ‘diversity’ strengthens a country. ‘Diversity is strength’ is perhaps the stupidest slogan of brainwashed zombies who support the flooding of Europe through alien cultures and foreign race immigrants.” This is the central message of the book and I think we all agree with that. Other differences are minor, and sometimes personal.

            This is not a holocaust revisionist book although it is included in a big way. But it’s a book about European survival in a time when things look pretty hopeless. Yes, I think Graf would say that the actual number of Jewish deaths cannot be known. I think he just got to a point when he didn’t want to study it any further. It happens. He’s turned to this other theme as of the greater importance.

            I recall in one place he used the words “Nazi war crimes” without putting “alleged” in front of it. I disliked that because in truth the “Nazis” did not commit any war and/or retaliatory actions that the American, British and Russians did not also commit. But he never used the term ‘American war crimes’, that I recall. However, I don’t think he actually believes that way — it was just a failure to be precise. I think basically Graf agrees with you on most of these issues you bring up — he may just be more careful in the way he expresses himself. After all, when you’re going to be attacked by the holocaust “historians” you have to be on solid ground.

          • By the way, I did find the passage you marked as P. 317 that you quoted as:

            —- P. 317: “… the October Revolution and the terror of the first years of revolution had been largely the work of Jews, but after Stalin’s takeover, the Soviet system became more and more Russified. The Jews continued to play an extremely important role in the USSR, but there was no longer any dominance from the 1930s onwards. The killings did not bring any military advantages to the German troops.”

            In my English translation, on page 402, “The Ukrainian Scenario”:

            — “After Stalin broke the Jewish domination during the 1930’s the dominant culture undisputedly was Russian-dominated Soviet culture. The Soviet Jews continued to play a role in the state and society that was not in proportion to their population [should be ‘out of proportion’]. The same was also true of the Armenians and the Georgians ….”

            Your last sentence about military advantage to German troops is nowhere is sight, and it doesn’t seem to fit there.

          • But the sentence is in my book By Graf in German language.

            The fact is that Graf says the Germans and the baltic (and ukrainian) policemen and SS-men shot 300 000 jews only because they were jews and not as a part of the partisan-war. That is murdering people and so Graf has found a holocaust. I don’t believe these fantasies. It seems that Graf and Mattogno trust too much in tha material in the Soviet and Russian Archives. Of course we have to be thankful for their achievements in the past, but now Graf believes in “Einsatz-holocaust”. I think he is fooled or there is something worse going on. Has he changed to the hoaxers’ camp? In the putinist way? He believes in some kind of “Train-holocaust” and believed soon when he was writing the book about the Belzec-camp.

            I think that the SS would not have deported jews to the East from the West while shooting a big part of the ordinary jews who were left there. And the Train-holocaust is not believeable theory, because the jews would had been easier to kill without the deportations.

            I think the Germans did not murder jews in the East either.

      • Thanks to Carolyn Yeager for doing the fact-checking here.

        Repe, have you considered that execution of hostile or criminal and subversive people including Jews might just as well have been carried out by civilian Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians and Ukrainians as by the Third Reich, or indeed the Allies? And for the same perfectly justifiable reasons?

        It would in fact be strange if a small number of such actions had not taken place in countries become war-zones.

        • That’s a lie. Of course the Jews and the commies have accused these people. However, murders were not allowed By te Germans. The SS-police and the local police were after the terrorists and the communists. They were after the criminals. They were not criminals.

          • Murders happen all the time, even though they’re outlawed by the Third Reich or anyone else. But I was talking about executions by patriotic partisans of criminals and subversives in wartime, not murder. If they absolutely did not happen ever as you claim, they should have. It is reasonable to consider that they may have – you are unreasonable.

          • To Repe – I am sorry you seem to have become unreasonable about this subject, and about Graf and Mattogno. In both your last comments you equate killing in wartime with murder. You insist the Germans did not murder anyone. Okay, I can understand where you’re coming from, but …

            You keep saying that Graf believes this and believes that, but you don’t believe those things. I didn’t find in his book (English translation) that he ever said he “believed” the things you say he “believes.” Nor did he say, or would he say, that “Germans and the baltic (and ukrainian) policemen and SS-men shot 300 000 jews only because they were jews and not as a part of the partisan-war.”

            The Google translation of that sentence is:
            — The number of Soviet Jews who were shot by the Germans and their helpers was probably on the order of 300,000 (final score: Jewish Red Army men and partisans fallen during the battle, Soviet Jews who had been killed during bombings, evacuations, etc.) Since their death had nothing to do with their descent or religion.

            The 300,000 includes all Soviet Jewish war deaths! And he says it had nothing to do with their race or religion, not because of it!! He also uses the modifier “probably.” That’s his guesstimate, which doesn’t seem overly high to me, especially since at least a million Jews from Poland alone fled into the Russian interior after 1939.

            Graf and Mattogno work from documents as responsible historians are supposed to do. They are able to translate documents from many languages (thanks mainly to Graf) and they have to make a judgement as to how credible they are. It’s easy for you to simply say they’re all fake, we can ignore them all and just make up our own narrative. That’s not how scientists operate.

            There were Jews deported to the East, and Jews shot for being caught in the act of partisan activity. Very different Jews. Plus, one trainload of dead Jews does not make a “train-holocaust.”

            I don’t know why you want to turn the German soldiers into choir-boys. They were fighting for their life and the lives of their families in Germany. I suspect that you’re not exactly fluent in German and maybe read the book too fast also.

          • There are scientists, who don’t believe in those documents. I have learned that one should not trust in experts and believe in their arguments and competence without any doubts. Did You see the document before my quotations? It was killing the jews. I still read the text so that he does not mean the killing of partisans. He clearly says that his number consists of murdered jews. Who were not partisans and the Germans did nt get any military benefit. He says the Germans and the other policemen and the SS-police murdered jews just because they were jews. So they collected them and murdered, from babies to grannies. No as repressials (Partisan-War). He talks like Wiesenthal. He says that the motive was some guestionable ideology. In reality, the jews in the party and NKVD were criminals, just like the comissars. When the Germans killed them, it was not a crime. There was not any perverted ideology behint that.

            And he is moarning every time and whining about those killings. He licks the hoaxers and the public opinion.

            Yes, I’m from Finland. Although I am not from estland or the other Baltic States or from the Ukraine, I can’t stand lying about these peoples.

          • And clearly he does not speak about just one train.

          • Well Repe, I did not read any of that in my book, translated into English by Fredrick Toben. Did Fredrick get it all wrong? I’m going to do two things:

            1) Send your comments to him and ask him to verify. I know Toben well and he will answer.

            2) Ask you to at least tell me the chapter these statements appeared in, so I can look for them. Was it all in Chapter 12 – The Foundation of the New World Order? I’m going to start re-reading that one right now.

            Stay tuned.

          • I don’t equate killing in wartime with murder. The killing of partisan is not a murder. Killing of civilians in a reprisal is not murdering. If You say that the germand murdered jews an they had orders for it (from high leaders), You accept that there have been a holocaust. I think You have not been clear enough. Nick Dean speaks about murdering. You sound like him when You say taht I think the germans had been chor-boys, if they would not have nurdered jews and this according the orders. Then You start to speak about killing partisans.

            I remember that in the middle of the war Himmler have said that he has ordered to kill the children of the partisans too in the reprisals. This may be true and this is not a holocaust, because the soviets used children and youth in their fight (Partisans) as kuriers and spies and even as soldiers. Why has he said that after a period of fighting? (I am not 100 % sure he really said that but the acts might not have been crimes at all)

            You have said that the Germans did not do anything the other armies did not. I think that they did much less than the Western Allies. The Western armies acted often like criminals and massmurderers.

            If I can remember, the Belzec-document was a crazy story that does not differ from the typical holohoax-shit at all. How can an expert believe in that? I think Graf is a putinist and a liar. He is not a prototyp, but much more sophisticated.
            Sure the Germans did count how many jews tehy had shot and how many jews and commies were shot. That one document that was in the book does not prove anything. The numbers are quite small and there were much criminal partisans and communists and the “Tsheka.jews” in the region. The document can be genuine. But if there is much documents and they cover 300 000 “Judenerschiessungen”, some of them or many must be forgeries.

            If there were not any scientists who would not be revisionists, then You should believe in the mainstream?

            I have read Walter Post’s book and I have made very different opinions from his from his book. I’m not sure what is the real opinion of Post. In Germany they must lie or they’ll be in jail. The Einsatzgruppen are “Die Prügelknaben” and at least the Wehrmacht must be saved. Someone must be guilty and everybody has accused the SS (SS, the fascists in the occupied areas and the police in there, also partly the Waffen SS) after the war. The Wehrmacht was all the time an enemy of Hitler and the NSDAP etc. The leaders there were behind many rumours and after the war they have lied very much and they have been afraid of accusations against them.

            I think the books of Graf and Mattogno consist of many facts that make the writings of Graf very questionable.

            If Graf does mean the Partisan-war, why is he so unclear? What does he have against these killings? Or why they are so wrong he says they are. Maybe many people think they are questionable or crimes. Why they are so great crimes according Graf?

          • PS Try again to google-translate this: “Die Zahl der von den Deutschen un ihren Helfern erschossenen sowjetischen Juden dürfte sich vermutlich in der Grössenordnung von 300 000 bewegt haben (Endnote: Im Kampf gefallene jüdische Rotarmisten und Partisanen sowie bei Bombardierungen, Evakuierungen etc. umgekommene sowjetische Juden sind in dieser Zahl nicht berücksichtigt, da ihr Tod nichts mit ihrer Abstammung oder Religion zu tun hatte.).”

            I think it was You who read it too fast. Or translate it Yourself. I think You got it wrong.

            The reds had evacuated most of the Jews to East soon before the war began.

            Of course Graf is making only estimations and the exact numbers cannot be found. But he has told his opinion.

          • To Repe — I am not going to reply to your last two comments – they are disorganized. You didn’t give me the chapters but I have found your stuff after reading the entire Holocaust chapter again. I think it’s much more mild than what you say. Here it is:

            On p 242-44 (English trans.) : Under the heading “The Jewish Tragedy”: the “picture that emerges from contemporary documents” –-

            —- “As of the end of 1941 a large proportion of European Jews were robbed of their property and deported to concentration camps and ghettos. Some of them died before reaching their destinations; in September 1942 around 2,000 Jews suffocated in a crowded deportation train to Belzec.”(14 – http://www.de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akif-Pirincci) —-

            So that is one trainload only – I didn’t find he mentioned any others.

            —- “… high death rates, caused in particular by raging epidemics of typhus, which is transmitted by lice. In 1942 this disease killed many of the inmates at Auschwitz. It reached its peak in the period from Sept. 7 to 11 wherein an average of 375 prisoners per day died of the disease.” —-

            So those who died of typhus (or died of anything in a concentration camp) he includes in the numbers of those killed.

            —- “A very large number of Jews were killed on the Eastern Front. This is apparent from documents whose authenticity cannot be contested.” —-

            And he details one in 1941, the diary of the SS Police Chief of Libau over a 2-month period, which adds up to 2,476 Jews shot. Then says he won’t elaborate further because a detailed study is currently in the making and he doesn’t want to prejudge the author’s conclusions. This might be Mattogno’s Einsatzgruppen book he’s referring to.

            —- ”The reasons for the shootings of Jews was that the Nazis regarded the Soviet Jews as ‘carriers of Bolshevism.’ In fact, the October Revolution and the terror of the first years of the revolution had been the work of Jews on a large scale, but after Stalin took power, the Soviet system was increasingly Russified. The Jews in the USSR still played a very important role, but from the 1930’s onward it was not a question of dominance. These killings then did not bring the German troops any military advantage.” —-

            There’s that sentence, as you said, but the context is not as you said. My own opinion is that Jewish partisans in Russia were doing great damage and
            causing terror to the German troops so of course they wanted to get rid of them. I think they were right in doing so, and in fact some Generals failed to do it on stupid moral grounds. Maybe the upcoming Einsatzgruppen book will shed some light on this.

            —- “The asserted casualties mentioned in the Holocaust literature (2.2 million SOVIET Jews -Krausnick and Wilhelm/ 1.35 million -Hillberg) do not correspond to reality. The number … may have probably been on the order of 300,000.” —–

            Nothing official from him, Repe.

            Page 292-3 under “Number of Jewish Victims”

            “Sanning’s [1983] figure of 300,000 Jewish victims [overall] is far too low because 350,000 Jews perished in concentration and labor camps alone. However, Sanning has done excellent work when calculating the postwar Jewish emigration … since 1945 over 1.5 million European Jews migrated overseas.”

            —- “We have neither reliable statistics on the ‘shot’ Jews on the Eastern Front nor do we know the number of displaced Jews … Personally, I suspect that the number of Jews who perished as a result of German persecution was between one million and one and a half million.” —-

            He didn’t say it can’t be known, only it isn’t known. ‘German persecution’ is too vague a term for me but I think he is trying to be very honest. He still says they didn’t “exterminate” any Jews and calls the Holocaust “a ludicrous story.” He agrees that World Jewry (Judaism) was responsible for the fake narrative along with the other victors.

            So you, Repe, have overreacted to a few things in the book. I also learned from Graf himself that the error I found at the beginning of that chapter relating to Elie Wiesel [I mentioned in the podcast] is the result of a wrong translation of what Graf actually wrote in German. It’s correct in the German edition. I suspected it could have been a translation error and I think there are a few more elsewhere. BTW, Graf saw the thread here and described you as the gentleman who slanders him and distorts the theses of his book.

          • http://www.justice.gov.il/mojheb/Eichman/t296.pdf
            PS-702. IMT, Vol. XXV, s. 304

            This was how the Germans treated the Jews in the occupied areas. F.E. Post says they really deported jews away to towns(ghettos) and camps from the partizan-regions. I wonder how on earth there could have been simultaneously commandos, who shot 300 000 jews “only because they were jews”.

            The jews had declared war on Germany many times. First time in 1933. When the Germans conquered large areas they realized that almost every jew was a spion and/or a partisan. And they already knew it. They had to remove them into the towns and peaceful areas. If the partisans attacked, suspiciously guilty people were shot in the reprissals. So in these reprissals the jews did not get shot only because they were jews. It was a result of their behavior as usual. Why does Graf speak so disgustingly: “the number of the jews who were killed only because they were jews”? But the Germans did not kill every jew in those regions. And one german casualty usually meant only death for 10-20 civilians. Sometimes more. And quite clearly criminal ones were shot I guess.

            I know the book has been published in Germany too. Maybe this could be the reason for these lies. I hope Graf has written a book that can be read in the Europe too and therefore he has abandoned his revisionism in it. But unfortunately he says that their new book will be just as disgusting as this one. If so, then he is a hoaxer.

          • “There’s that sentence, as you said, but the context is not as you said. My own opinion is that Jewish partisans in Russia were doing great damage and
            causing terror to the German troops so of course they wanted to get rid of them. I think they were right in doing so, and in fact some Generals failed to do it on stupid moral grounds.”

            But the footnote on the same page: “Im Kampf gefallene jüdische Rotarmisten und Partisanen sowie bei Bombardierungen, Evakuierungen etc. umgekommene sowjetische Juden sind in dieser Zahl nicht berücksichtigt, da ihr Tod nichts mit ihrer Abstammung oder Religion zu tun hatte”

            So You are telling me that the number does include partisans killed outside the battles and the jews killed in the reprissals? It does not include jews fallen as partisans in the battles? Hmm. Maybe Graf should write much more clearly.

          • Maybe if you were German, instead of a Finn with a very different language, you could read Graf with understanding. Maybe you should have read the English translation instead of the German.

            That footnote “on the same page” is to a very different point he made. And it contains the statement “… because their deaths had nothing to do with their religion or ethnic origin” from a book written by two Germans. It’s not even written by Graf. Yet you are using it with a very different bullet point on the page and attributing it directly to Graf. You have been mixing everything up all along. That makes it impossible to take you seriously or discuss anything with you.

            I also notice you don’t seem able to translate the German passage into English yourself — that has been the case throughout this thread. So I’ve had it with you, Repe. For good.

          • P317: “Die Zahl der von den Deutschen un ihren Helfern erschossenen sowjetischen Juden dürfte sich vermutlich in der Grössenordnung von 300 000 bewegt haben.” And the footnote nr. 389 was exactly to this sentence, number and point. Buy the german book and You’ll see this.

          • Yes, I can:

            Endnote: Im Kampf gefallene jüdische Rotarmisten und Partisanen sowie bei Bombardierungen, Evakuierungen etc. umgekommene sowjetische Juden sind in dieser Zahl nicht berücksichtigt, da ihr Tod nichts mit ihrer Abstammung oder Religion zu tun hatte.).”

            =The jews dead in the Red army in the war and the partisans dead in the battles, the Soviet jews dead in the evacutions etc. have not been included in this number, because their religion or ethnicity have not caused their deaths/the cause oftheir deaths have not anything to do with their religion or ethnicity

  • the white birth rate has descended below the sustainable level.
    and the stats do not include mixed race births by white mothers.
    if it continues at this rate the white race will be as good as extinct by the end of this century.
    that declining white birth rate occurs because of the conspiracy but also because it is a natural phenomenon in a progressive society with a high standard of living, which is what develops in white countries. norway, sweden.
    the higher standard of living is not, as is the pc position, because white people are ruthless and exploitative, but because they are generally more intelligent and industrious. some say this is because they grew in harsher climates, where survival required those qualities.
    and a reduction in human population levels in general is one huge factor in rescuing the biosphere.
    the war on white people is just one angle on the increasing dystopia.
    the evolution of human society depends upon a massive reform of the religious, corporate and political methodology, which may have a chance to happen if the more progressive elements are able to continue the evolutionary process.
    no establishment religion, corporate idea or current political doctrine advocates population reduction.
    but you can bet that all three of those are jacking the immigrant crisis for all they’re worth.
    this advanced society does not necessarily require a master race, as the jews and perhaps others have in mind for themselves, but wherever nations are evolving, as the usa once was, they have to be preserved.
    environmental rescue is the correct political path.
    it starts with the preservation of all national borders and the elevation of the living standard inside those borders.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5Q9S3epIDs

  • Matthew/Boston

    Has anyone noticed how Israel IS OUT OF THE MSM NEWS ALTOGETHER now? Somewhere, I heard or read the MSM jew brass has made the decision to keep Israel out of the news.

    And what about that teen Yid over in Israel accused of phoning in hundreds or thousands of threats to jewish establishments in the U.S. and other nations. I noticed the MSM news dropped that story right quick!

  • Great, engaging discussion with Carolyn :) so happy there are others out there who truly *SEE*. I have heard about the age of destruction in the Kali Yuga as well. I found it interesting that she mentioned this. I also think Satan/Loki is running the planet and that the ugly joos are his minions as well as the mooslims. The joos just don’t get it. I heard Arthur Kemp mention that joos only have power when white gentiles are the majority. Once whites are gone, joos will be done for. Joos always over play their hand; the filthy scum that they are. Satan doesn’t give a damn about the joos. Once he is done with them they won’t have anything anymore.

  • I find this number very big. 300 000 is much too high anyway. If the victimx of the repressalies are in it or not.

    How could it be possible, that the Wehrmacht knew nothing about this ongoing genocide? The comendants an the commanding generals did not notice anything.

    I remember that one german scientist said that the war diary of colonel Carl von Andrian may be a forgery. He left it to a german court in 1960 and it was published in 2000. If i remember it was A. Naumann. In my mind the diary sounds partly unbelieveable and it can be ordered from the holohoaxers. The processes of the 60’s started soon after that.

    There all kinds of documents. in the 60’s the german court did not believe the soviet claims about the murders of the jews in Slutsk and Smilowitshe. There were 4000 jews on Sluzk before the repressials and after them 3800 jews lived in Sluzk. The court said rhat the numbers of the jews that were shot there were only 300 and 30.The court said that a ghetto had been built in Sluzk just after the killings. Because the killer was the Wehrmacht, the court coukd declare, that the shootings were a part of the partisan war and not just tha acts of racism. But after the Soviet Union had collapsed, the scientists have the monthly report of the comendant of the White Ruthenia. There he says that 5600 jews were shot on Sluzk and Kkeck. Walter Post says that it seems that this report is genuine. Hmm.

    Graf’s book is full of putinist propaganda and lies about the ukrainians. He says that the Ukrainians shoty down the jumbojet MH-017. And so on. How could I trust him in the other matters? And what about carlo Mattogno? He believes (in the book “Schiffbruch”) that there could have been some gassings of the jews in the cocentration camp of Natzweiler/Strutthof. Bullshit.