Support Canadian Patriot Arthur Topham!
Editor’s note: What follows is the full text of a written Q&A discussion I had with the persecuted Canadian patriot and truth teller Arthur Topham, publisher of The Radical Press whose motto is “Digging to the root of the issues since 1998.”
Arthur Topham most certainly has been getting to the root of the problems confronting not just Canada, but the entire Western world. As a result of his publishing activities, Topham has been persecuted, slandered, and vilified. He has been accused and is currently being prosecuted by the Canadian federal government for allegedly violating Canada’s tyrannical “Hate Propaganda” laws, which he explains and elaborates on in detail below.
I highly encourage readers to support Topham’s fundraiser which is raising money for his legal defense fund. I recently chipped in $20 – now it’s your turn!
JF: Over the course of the past decade or so, you have been targeted by the Canadian government on two separate occasions. In 2007, the Canadian Human Rights Commission alleged you violated Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” laws. The federal legal system in Canada also charged you with an alleged violate of Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” laws in 2012, a case that is still on-going. Can you briefly outline Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” laws, and describe their tyrannical nature?
Also, can you explain how these laws were enacted in the first place? Were they enacted at the behest of a particular organized political faction in Canada? What is their intended purpose and how are these laws utilized in real life?
AT: I covered all of these issues in some detail back in May of 2014 in an article titled, “Bad Moon Rising: How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws,” which I encourage you and your readers to read in its entirety. My assertion then (and now) was that Canada’s judicial system has been infiltrated and co-opted by foreign Zionist Jew lobby groups operating in Canada since as far back as 1919, in particular the now defunct Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC) and B’nai Brith Canada (BBC).
The premise of my argument is that Canada’s Zionist Jew media cartel has always been an integral part of their overall plan to formulate and establish Orwellian laws inimical to the rights and freedoms of the people. Frankly stated it’s the modus operandi of these foreign-controlled Jewish lobbies to react precisely in this fashion for that is how they mendaciously twist and stifle debate on any issue of national importance to Canadians; be it our Charter rights or our fundamental right (and responsibility as patriotic protectors of our country) to question the direction of the nation’s foreign policies which, under the current Harper regime, are deliberately replacing the nation’s longstanding principles of common sense and aligning our once relatively respected political ideals with the present agenda of the Zionist Jewish state of Israel, considered by most intelligent people to be the most rogue, racist, supremacist, violent, atheistic and apartheid nation on the face of the planet.
The template for Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” legislation was, from the start, designed in such a way as to function as a legal shield; a mechanism if you will which the Zionist lobbyists use to defend themselves against any allegations aimed at exposing their covert actions; all of which are meant to benefit their inordinate influence over Canadian politics, jurisprudence and the criminal actions of the foreign state of Israel.
When we go back in history and retrace the steps that these legal interlopers have taken since the end of World War 2 it’s clearly evident what they’ve been up to, especially in light of the now increasing displeasure that more and more Canadians are showing toward the actions of the Jewish lobbies when it comes to their relentless, telling attacks upon our Charter of Rights and Freedoms which include the fundamental right to freedom of expression as stated in Sec. 2b of the Charter.
All that’s required in order to verify this war against our rights and freedoms, including our most basic right of speaking out and expressing our views on issues vital to our national well being, is to delve into any and all of the legal cases over the past forty-four years associated with the issue of freedom of expression and one will see immediately that in practically every instance the first special interest lobby group lining up and vying for intervenor status is inevitably a Jewish one. And furthermore, concomitant with their zealousness to intervene is usually the underlying fact that it is they themselves who were instrumental in bringing forth the charges. And if that isn’t the norm then they’re undoubtedly there to make sure that the complainant (usually an agent in one form or another) gets the maximum support of their power and influence in the courts and the media.
The foundation for all of this pretence and deceit was laid at the end of the last world war when the Zionist-controlled U.K. and USA began cranking up their deliberately orchestrated accusations that Hitler and the German military were guilty of having attempted to wipe out the Jews in Europe by gassing millions of them and then cremating the innocent souls in ovens to cover up their horrendously heinous crime.
Once the Allies had gained their victory, the Zionists via subterfuge, deception, political pressure and the willing assistance of their controlled media and Hollywood, were finally in a position to have their long sought “6 Million Jewish Holocaust” footings poured, thus assuring themselves of a firm propaganda foundation for the erection of their fabricated phantasy; one that would then allowing for the rest of the subsequent monkey business of taking over and manipulating national and international laws, all of which was based upon their cunningly crafted pretext for tyranny known as the “Holocaust”.
After that landmark lie was accomplished it was merely a matter of time, patient plodding, and endless, inordinate propaganda and pressure placed upon the rest of the population of the world who had still to accept the “Holocaust” hoax and be subsequently convinced of the dire and urgent necessity for enacting legislation that would make it illegal to promote either “genocide” or “hatred” toward any identifiable group.
Only now that the real history of the last eighty years is finally coming to light, thanks to the free and open Internet, are we finally getting to see the original, unadulterated script as it was so cleverly designed by the Zionist forces of the day; a program of diabolic, Machiavellian political pragmatism designed to destroy democratic institutions and replace them with a Zionist-based illuminist, occult vision of a macabre New World Order where they, and only they, would hold all the power and control over the world’s people along with all the resources of the planet.
Such was the set and setting here in Canada when the Jewish lobbies started their underhanded campaign to create “Hate Propaganda” laws that would be and are being used against Canadian citizens today.
One might legitimately say that these deceptive measures to control freedom of speech actually began even before the commencement of WW2. After Hitler and the National Socialist Party came to power in 1933 the Jews in Canada were already growing fearful that Canadians might begin to believe what Germany was saying about the International financiers and the Jewish control of their own beleaguered nation and so in the province of Manitoba, (of all places) the government passed a statute to combat what was apparently perceived to be a “rise in the dissemination of Nazi propaganda”. The premise of which (The Libel Act, R.S.M. 1913, c. 113, s. 13A (added S.M. 1934, c. 23, s. 1) was later to become The Defamation Act, R.S.M. 1987, c. D20, s. 19(1) and was in all likelihood the first volley launched against freedom of expression.
Up until 1970 Section 181 of the Criminal Code, which reads: “Every one who wilfully publishes a statement, tale or news that he knows is false and that causes or is likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.” was the only provision in the Code even remotely connected to the offence of group defamation but it didn’t, at the time, specifically make mention of “hate propaganda”.
As stated above, when WW2 ended the work of the Zionist lobbyists began in earnest when their “Holocaust” card began appearing as the foundational pretext to any and all discussions surrounding “human rights” and “discrimination”. The first step in the direction of censorship was the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 with its references to “hate propaganda” and by 1953 we find that the Canadian Jewish Congress was already diligently pursuing efforts toward this end with their attempt to insert anti-hate propaganda provisions into the Criminal Code which was being revised in that same year.
Their deceptive labours eventually bore fruit when the lobby was finally able to convince Canada’s federal Justice Minister Guy Favreau in 1965 to appoint a special (interest) committee to look into the purported “problems” connected with the dissemination of “hate propaganda” in Canada.
Surprisingly (not!) what became known as “The Special Committee on Hate Propaganda in Canada” and later abbreviated (for propaganda purposes) to the “Cohen Committee” was headed by a Jewish lawyer, Dean Maxwell Cohen, Q.C., Dean of the Faculty of Law, McGill University. While not all members of the committee were Jewish there was one other notable lawyer instrumental in aiding the Jewish lobby in their relentless quest for censorship laws. This was none other than Professor Pierre E. Trudeau, Associate Professor of Law, University of Montreal, soon to become Canada’s Prime Minister.
The committee studied the alleged “problem” from January 29th to November 10th, 1965 and their conclusions called for new legislation that ultimately affected the Post Office Act, the Customs Act, and most critically in today’s context, what is now Section 319 of the Criminal Code, the very same section that’s being used to shut down RadicalPress.com and threaten its Publisher and Editor (me) with a possible two year jail sentence for having expressed opinions and facts on Zionism, Jews and the state of Israel.
My case is designed to be the test case for the Jewish lobbyists working in Canada. Should they win and find me guilty under Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada then that precedent will undoubtedly unleash a flood of subsequent attacks upon the rest of the bloggers and publishers and writers and artists living in Canada who also see an imminent threat to their freedom of expression encapsulated in this draconian, Marxist legislation designed with malicious forethought to censor truth and stymie any and all attempts to achieve and maintain justice and freedom of speech in Canada.
In terms of how they’re utilized it’s quite simple. Anyone who so desires can file a “complaint” with the RCMP “Hate Crime” unit and allege that a person is, as in my case, “Communicating statements, other than in private conversation, [that] willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.”
If the complainant happens to be an agent of one of the Jewish lobby organizations here in Canada such as B’nai Brith (which they were) or a Jewish sycophant, as was the case with the second person who filed an identical complaint against me back in 2011, then it’s practically a foregone conclusion that the charge will be accepted by the RCMP and then forwarded on to the Attorney General’s department in whatever province the accused lives to be processed and okayed prior to an Indictment being handed down.
JF: How exactly did you violate Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” laws? What specifically did you publish or openly state that justified filing charges against you?
AT: We’re dealing with two separate tentacles of the “Hate Propaganda” Beast when we speak of Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” laws. In the first instance, prior to its repeal in June of 2012, Canada had a special “Hate Crime” section embedded in the Canadian Human Rights Act known as Sec. 13(1). It was this section that the Jewish lobby B’nai Brith Canada first used to attack me back in 2007 when one of their Hasbara agents (who I am presently under a court order not to publish his name) working for the League For Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada complained to the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) that my website, RadicalPress.com was “discriminating against persons or groups of persons on the grounds of race, national and/or ethnic origin and religion by communicating messages over the Internet which would likely expose individuals who are of the Jewish faith, to hatred and/or contempt contrary to section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act.”
On Valentine’s Day, February 14th, 2007 I received an email from this Zionist Jew troll demanding that I remove articles from my website which they claimed were “anti-Semitic”. They used an alias in their email and refused to divulge to me what articles they felt fitted their description. Because they wouldn’t discuss anything beyond the ultimatum I told them to take a hike. Late that same year on November 20th, 2007 I received a letter from the Canadian Human Rights Commission stating that I had been accused of this “crime”. The complainant’s biggest beef was that I had the audacity to have The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion on my website in digital form. They claimed that this was “anti-Semitic” and “Hate literature”. As well they bitched and complained about seventeen other articles written by various internet writers like John Kaminski, Mark Glenn, Curt Maynard (deceased), Eric Hunt, Henry Makow and Chris Cook and myself.
Later the CHRC attempted to change the text of the initial charge to read, “The premise of this complaint is a contention that Arthur Topham of Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada and his internet publication known as Radicalpress.com contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.” That was the first instance here in Canada where the Jew lobbyists began their campaign to make it a “hate crime” to criticize citizens of a foreign country. Such chutzpah! It didn’t work but nonetheless I was dragged through the onerous quasi-legal proceedings right up until the federal government repealed Sec. 13 in 2012.
B’nai Brith knew well in advance of the repeal of this specious Orwellian censorship clause that it was a fait accompli and so they set about looking for another way to continue their attack on me and that’s when they decided to use the Criminal Code of Canada to further their heinous actions and so in 2011 two of their agents, one the same Hasbara rat who first filed the Sec. 13 complaint against me back in 2007 and a second agent, not a Jew but working for them, both filed complaints with the British Columbia Hate Crime Team (BCHCT) part of the RCMP using Sec. 319(2) of the CCC which states:
319. Wilful promotion of hatred
(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
The first complaint was filed on April 28, 2011 by the Jew sycophant the day after I published an article on my website titled Hating Harper. It was just prior to the federal election in that same year. Then, on May 30, 2011 the same B’nai Brith rat filed his complaint alleging, from what the arresting officer (former) Det. Cst. Terry Wilson told me, that I was promoting the total genocide of the Jewish population of the world and obviously basing his complaint on my satire of Theodore N. Kaufmann’s book Germany Must Perish! which I had changed to Israel Must Perish!.
In the case of this last charge the main articles published on my website that were complained of were:
- The Protocols
2. Israel Must Perish!
3. The Biological Jew by Eustice Mullins
4. The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today by Elizabeth Dilling
JF: How has the mass media in Canada and around the world responded to your case? Has it received any significant coverage in the press? Has there been any response from the legal community or academia, either in support of you or against you?
AT: The “mass media” aka the Jewish-controlled media in Canada and elsewhere responded to my Sec. 319(2) charge as soon as the Indictment came down in November of 2012. Here are some of the articles that were published in some of Canada’s Jew media:
- National Post – B.C. man charged with promoting hatred against Jews on website
- Ottawa Sun – B.C. blogger charged with hate crime for promoting hatred against Jews
- 24hrs Vancouver – Hate crime charges levelled against B.C. blogger following six-month investigation
- Jewish Telegraph Agency – Canadian miner charged for anti-Jewish website
Basically, of one mind, they were the same. These were followed by an interview on the former Sun News Media show The Source with my former lawyer Doug Christie (deceased) where he spoke with Ezra Levant about my case. That interview can be viewed here.
Within the short span of about six minutes good ol’ free speech advocate Ezra Levant managed to slander, defame and libel me as many times as possible punctuating every comment or question to lawyer Doug Christie with at least one or more ad hominem epithet all in order to show the world just how grand and liberal the mainstream media truly is when it comes to freedom of expression.
Yes, said Ezra, that Topham is an “anti-Semite” and “offensive” and an “anti-Zionist [which is] code for anti-Semitic” and his website is “gross” and his comments “repulsive” and everything that he does is “motivated by a form of malice” and on top of that I also think he’s a “nobody” and an “anti-Semitic idiot and a right wing wacko” and you know really when it comes right down to it “I HATE ARTHUR TOPHAM!” Isn’t free speech for the Jews a wonderful thing when you own all the media?
Such was the immediate coverage of my case in the aftermath of the Indictment. Since then there’s been a total blackout of my case other than very supportive and ongoing coverage from my local community newspaper the Quesnel Cariboo Observer which publishes regular updates on my case. But I suspect the silent treatment will likely cease when my trial begins on October 26th as there are no restrictions on reporting the case and they will likely gear up to start vilifying me once again. This is why I’ve been making arrangements with the alternative media to cover the trial and get our side of the story out on the net as much as possible.
To answer the last part of your question there wasn’t any response from the legal community until, by the grace of God, I was contacted by the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA) in September of 2014 notifying me that they had decided to support my case and had sent a petition to the Honorable Suzanne Anton Attorney General of B.C. asking her to retract her consent for the criminal proceedings against me. I’ve also been trying for a long time to get the B.C. Civil Liberties Association to come on board but thus far they’ve been dragging their heels although promising me that they’ll post a supportive statement on their website soon. Their time is fast running out though.