Jews Demand Caller Exposing Jewish Supremacy Be Identified, Arrested

Jew World Order

The Jews openly admit and brag about their power and influence in the Western world, but if you say anything about it you’re an “anti-Semite” who needs to be reported to the police. #WithJewsWeLose

Following a 13-minute call-in commentary to a BBC radio program in which a British man made a number of factual and easily verifiable observations about Jewish supremacy and power in the Western world, including Jewish control over international finance and banking systems, the organized Jewish community in the United Kingdom is demanding the BBC provide police with the caller’s information. The Times of Israel reports:

Screenshot (80)

A BBC radio phone-in program in the early hours of December 22 allowed a caller to stay on air for almost 13 minutes in a rant that castigated Jews and their “rule” over British society, a watchdog group said.

The Campaign Against Antisemitism called the incident shocking “even for the BBC.”

As first reported by the UK Jewish News, “Andy from St. Margaret’s” started his attack on Radio London’s Simon Lederman radio program by stating that the world is “not free” and “they are trying to control us more and more and more. They want to put a chip up our backsides…the elites… A ring through our noses, and a vizor for our horizons… the Rothschilds… It’s about the Zionists.”

Andy referenced well-known anti-Semitic tropes, claiming that the Jews didn’t originate from Palestine but that most came from “an empire called Khazaria” in eastern Europe and that “the Rothschilds, the people who own the Bank of England, the people who own the Federal Reserve, they’re all Zionist Jews. The people who own the corporate America, the media, you’ll find if you just do a little bit of research, they’re all Zionist Jews. We are ruled by Zionist Jews.”

“They control money, money,” he repeated. […]

Andy continued by complaining about an obsession with the Holocaust in mainstream media, and repeating the mantra that “we are dominated by the Jews’ system, the financial Jewish system. The Rothschilds control us.”

The full interview can be heard on the show’s BBC iPlayer site, starting at 03:07:28.

A BBC spokesperson defended the decision to allow the caller to go on speaking, saying that “the aim of the program is to discuss and debate issues raised by our listeners. This was a live phone in and the caller was challenged on his views throughout the conversation.” After the interview, the spokesperson added, “reaction from other listeners was also broadcast.”

Jonathan Sacerdoti, director of communication at the Campaign Against Antisemitism, said the incident was shocking “even for the BBC…. The radio presenter simply allowed an ignorant racist to speak for nearly [a] quarter of an hour while offering no counter-argument, correction or condemnation of his views that Jews control money, banks, commerce and the media. We expect the BBC to now hand the caller’s telephone number to the police.”

The reaction from the organized Jewish community, led by the Campaign Against Antisemitism (White people need an organization devoted to combating anti-White slanders and stereotypes!), is so typical, no commentary is even required.

As regular readers and followers of The Realist Report are well aware, the Jews have a long history of suppressing and persecuting individuals and nations that refuse to go along with the Jewish agenda of world domination and subjugation, commonly referred to as the New World Order.

Think about it: the Jews in the UK are openly demanding the BBC hand over this caller’s personal information to police so an investigation can be opened and the man can be prosecuted for “hate crimes,” simply by making a few basic observations publicly. This is totally unacceptable, and I hope the good people of the UK rally behind this courageous caller.

Telling the truth about Jewish supremacy and power in the West, among other important subjects, is a crime, according to Jews. Making basic, factual observations and criticisms of Jews, Jewish supremacy, and various Jewish-promoted and instigated agendas, such as cultural Marxism, wars in the Middle East, massive non-White immigration to the West, etc., is “evil” and “racist” and “anti-Semitic,” we’re led to believe. What utter nonsense!

If there is one thing the Jews hate the most, it is people standing up and refusing to accept their lies, their programming, and their tyrannical, anti-human agenda. And frankly, we do not have time to cower before the Jews anymore. These people have to be exposed and isolated – the future of our planet depends upon it.

Subscribe to The Realist Report today, and support pro-White independent media!


  • One need only take an objective look at how they have turned EVERY nation trusting enough to embrace them into a maggot riddled political/moral/economic SEWER to understand the enmity they feel for every Goim on this planet. Being a Christian, I don’t hate anyone but “the tribe” are so vicious and have bought the souls of so many in the Judas Class of D.C. I fear for our world. When one considers the treachery of the Wilsons, Roosevelts, Churchills et al in annihilating Germany for their masters rather than uniting with them to free Russia and Eastern Europe and the tens of millions they mutilated to death, it will begin keeping you awake at night with worry for fellow Christians/Muslims and our very world. Truly they are The Synagogue of Satan.

    • paschn: My comment is currently being moderated, but I closed with a reference to scripture Rev. 2:9 which closes with “…but are the synagogue of Satan.” Yes sir, you are right on the mammon !

    • “And frankly, we do not have time to cower before the Jews anymore.”

      Yes, indeed, and it has to be done on a spiritual basis (not the vulnerable political), for that is where the REAL FIGHT with this demonic lot is:

    • paschn: you keep pointing at being a Christian. Well, what have you got to say for yourself? Christianity nothing but aided Jewish cabal in destruction of people of this world. It is a perfect tool of creating more fog in people’s minds and diverting energies of unsuspecting followers to the use of criminals. And Muslims want to cut off people’s heads from what I keep hearing. Is it out of goodness of their heart that they want to do it? “To save you we must kill you” sort of thing. Just like Christian did to all of the Gnostics? I condemn Christianity, I condemn all religions that have it written in all of their books what horrible people are those who don’t subscribe to their particular religious dogma. And these religious books are wedging a war using human bodies as cannonballs until there will nobody else left to kill and convert.
      I suggest you go to and begin waking up to the reality of who, why and how created this purely political ideology with no any benefit to any human in mind AT ALL. All the religious stories, no matter how wonderful lead the believer in them into battlefields of the world. First you read about such wonderful peaceful religion of peace and love, next in church you pay handsome incomes to priests that will keep you in penance and then turn around and enable perpetrators to commit mass murders on your money. And you shake your hands off and DON’T accept any responsibility as long as your prayers are punctually recited.
      Christians, Muslims and other believers of peace are passive criminals aiding active criminals of the world. Catholic church was taken over by Jewish cabal in 1800’s. Did they let you know of what’s happening to them? NO. They are perfectly content with keeping their flocks of believers in ignorance. Not a peep. And now look at it. I am appalled at all the true believers of this world thinking they are not committing any crimes by giving their traitor churches and denominations enormous amounts of money that could otherwise be spent by honest citizens on communities and feeding all the hungry of the world-and instead with which people are killed all over the world. And if you want to defend your particular religion you are in love with it WAY TOO MUCH, and it is just pleasure for you, a cozy way to feel secure-no matter if it engenders misery for so many do to misuse of your money you pay to criminals in your religious stupor.
      There is no honor in being a member of any of major religions of today. It is a disgrace.

      • well put fun Jewry

      • Elena, so many outrageous lies in your comment, where do I start? You know what? It’s not worth the effort.

      • Elena, the Roman Catholic church is not truly ‘Christian’, it has its origions in the old Babylonian and Egyptian mysteries, even to the effect of worshiping Mary , the mother of Jesus as if she were the Goddess ISIS. The Vatican as Rome, is the City of seven hills, the church is the Immoral lady riding the beast, and drunk with the blood of Martyrs indeed, all her wars, inquisitions, burning the saints of Jesus at the stake and forbidding the common man from reading the bible…saying the mass in Latin , and leaving the people in ignorance. The Little horn of the Book of Daniel is the Pope as well. Read Daniel, it gives an EXACT time line for the beginning of Christ’s ministries, as well as other predications. As for myself, I have walked with the lord and his angels have more than once called me away from immanent danger. I latterly owe him my physical life, not just spiritual. Believe what you may, the Armanian and Egyptian (Coptic) churchs kept the faith thoughout the ages, The Roman church was NOT the only (mis) representative of Christianity.

  • To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize – Voltaire. (who also wrote “You seem to me to be the maddest of the lot. The Kaffirs, the Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and more honest people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny”)

  • I listened to the 13 minute portion and will go back later and listen to the rest of it. I liked what the caller was saying, but Simon Lederman (the host) seemed to have boxed the caller in which prevented the caller from getting the entire truth out there. Yes, he was allowed to speak more than most, but I think the caller came up a bit short on his exposition due to the distractions thrown in there by the host. They did discuss the so-called Holocaust of the Jews in Germany during the 1930-1945 period, but they never got down to why the National Socialists were supposedly performing genocide against the Jews and/or why. Alexandr Solzhenitsyn explained the so-called Russian Revolution of 1917 much better, and it was the same people (Zionist Jews)who committed that disaster and implemented the atheistic communist government known as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and the Holocaust they committed against the tens of millions of Russian peasants in the 1930s that went on and repeated their evil against Germany in WWII. They are Zionist Jews and they now own the United States Government and the Federal Reserve. Read “The Myth of German Villainy” by Benton L. Bradberry (2012) and start your research and questions after reading that book. Right now I am reading the work of General Leon Degrelle, a Belgian, who spent most of the 1930s-1945 trying to stop the communist advance against Western Europe and escaped to Spain and lived out his life there under the protection of the Franco Spanish Government. He died in Spain in 1994 and was the last major leader surviving from WWII. As the caller attempted to explain, the current State of Israel is occupied and lead mostly by Zionist Jews who really are running a communist state in Israel. Look at the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto and you will see that the United States Government is pretty much in compliance with all ten planks ! Look at all the high-level positions in the U. S. Government and you will see that most are occupied by dual-citizen Israelis and that includes many in our U. S. Congress. Search dual citizens in our government and you will get several hits showing who these people are. Then read from scripture in the KJV in the Book of Revelation, Chapter 2, Verse 9 and you will have a clue.

    • John 8:44 KJV couldn’t have said it better

      • Maxx: I really dislike having to say this, but you are so right about John 8:44. We have been lied to over and over about this entire murderous scam being played upon the human race, and it is time for the people to wake up and stop supporting them !

    • Another good book to read .. if you can obtain it .. is “Under the Sign of the Scorpion” by Estonian writer/historian Juri Lina. If you do have the book and haven’t read it yet, prepare to be totally horrified by its contents. Lina leaves no atrocity out .. and I absolutely shivered in horror when I first read it.
      I thought the Mongols were extreme in their barbarity, but the Bolshevik Jews even outdid them in horrific atrocities.

      • Eileen: I have located copies of this book, but they are way too expensive for my budget, but will go for it as soon as the ship of gold comes into my port. Thanks for the tip on “Under The Sign of the Scorpion,” it sounds like a very important book to read.

          • Thanks Mark, at least now I can read it here until I win the lottery and buy my own copy for my library.

        • I’ve reduced the below to having NO links, NO website given in the user info, and yet it still hits the “…appears to be spam” filter… John that spam thing needs some serious tuning; it’s way overzealous! Does it object to the (former) dollar signs? It doesn’t tell you what it has a problem with; only says to go back & check everything– so u page back and it’s wiped your former comment attempt, need to start over. At least I knew to have the comment body copied to Notepad before submitting! :(

          “… Scorpion” 399.95 “New” at amzn, “Used” for the special price of 187.61 :)

          spam filter here won’t let me post any links, but find links to the amazon listing, a free archive-org copy, a youtub docu based on “…Scorpion” and more at tinyurl dt cm slash j3fd8et

  • Hope someone had the presence of mind to record it somehow. Hope it gets onto Youtube. Wonder if the BBC would scream copyright breach?

  • It’s odd how the Jews want to claim their religion is a race…

    How does one go about talking about their toxic religion without being branded an anti-semitic? Seems the talking heads of the Zionists are very racists. How do they even know if you’re not a semite as well? What B.S.

  • Mr. Blair M. Phillips

    Zionism is a political ideology. Judaism is about love and service. What percentage of the 130 million Jews in the world support Zionism….a very low percentage.

    • The Talmud is one evil peace of fecal matter, very anti Christian.

      • That is an understatement. The Talmud is sick, perverted, cruel, hateful…and ridiculous. It is the highest intellectual achievement of the Jew. Even God consults this book says the Jew.

    • this is so full of BS, and there are not 130millions jews on this planet, there are no more than 25 to 27 million world wide, judiasm is not about love and service, it is about war, it is about goys , it is about jewish supermacy, it is about the jew being a god and everyone else is a servant to the jew, this is what judiasm is, well this will stop, after you people start ww3, and then the world will go after the jew with whats left of mankind and hunt all you down and i will tell you this picture will not be pretty

    • I agree that Zionism and Judaism are different. The normal everyday Jew is victimized by the Zionists to further the political agenda, Theodor Herzl the founder of political Zionism wanted the Holo-hoax so they could create the state of Israel. The political Zionists used the Jews who opposed them as the victims in the Holo-hoax. Barry Chamish and Henry Makow talk a lot about this topic. A lot of Jews are victims, to the talmudic Synagogue of Satan just like the rest of us.

    • Modern Judaism is based on the Talmud …a hate filed monstrosity of a book…no one but a fool or troll would claim Judaism teaches its members to serve Goyim…how many Jews oppose the creation of Israel as a JEWISH state or protest the abuse of Palestinians? Very very few …

      • KingEdwardthe1wasRight1290

        Well said Ron, The Talmud, makes it clear to the world, Jews consider all non-Jews to be nothing but “cattle” for the Jews to exploit in any and every way. The Jews even have specific words for non-Jews that include the meaning of inferiority, such as “gentiles” and “goyim.”

    • 130 million?! Yeah, I always knew they were lying about being only 2% of the American populace. “LOL”

  • Well Jews will certainly never change their horrific behavior – they have too much invested- so they attempt to obscure the truth by creating laws which criminalize anyone who speaks it. More people should speak out like this caller…only civil disobedience can break their hold.

  • “The (Jewish) Matrix is a system, Neo. That (Jewish) system is our enemy. But when you’re inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that (Jewish) system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the (Jewish) system, that they will fight to protect it.”

  • Sounds like the Jews are “taking gas” in the court of public opinion! hahahaha

  • Not only are The Jews a conspiracy, the are the oldest, largest, most ruthless and utterly vicious conspiracy mankind has ever faced. Their plot to take over the world is as old as the Torah. As a matter of fact, it IS the Torah.

    And make no mistake, any Goy (Gentile) that refuses to be willingly enslaved by the Jew is to be killed, mercilessly. The Jew-G_d Yahwey said so himself, several times, in that filthy garbage called the Torah, the first five books of the Old Testament.

    Perhaps this incident will help some Brits to realize just WHO the enemy of mankind is and how deceptive and dangerous the Jew and the Jewish Agenda truly is.

  • Doubtless, the caller may have wanted to mention (but was likely prevented) Israeli terrorism in Palestine, the Mossad connection to ISIS leader Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi, Israeli air support for Daesh, the “five dancing Israelis” (IDF intelligence agents) in the aftermath if 9-11 and possibly the assault on the USS Liberty killing 34 of the US Navy’s best…

  • “And frankly, we do not have time to cower before the Jews anymore.”

    Yes, indeed, and it has to be done on a spiritual basis (not the vulnerable political), for that is where the REAL FIGHT with this demonic lot is:

  • crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. crucify him. vv

  • hey everything this person say about jews is so correct, come on people, the zionist jews want to start ww3, do you want to lose your child to war, after spending so much time and money on your child and then government snatches them from you and you don’t even get paid for all your time. Come on people look at the duo citizenship of these zionist jews in western government whose only loyalty is for israel only and they are all pushing for ww3, think about this, or your life will be at stake

  • Jewish supremacism? Jews own the media to prevent you from discovering how they perform false flags to create Israel (King David Hotel 1946) and expand it (September 11th). So what happened on 9 11?
    An Israeli False Flag Operation is what happened.
    1. The Project for a New American Century was written in Israel in 1996 under the name – A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.
    Requires a new Pearl Harbor for their plan.
    2. Zionist Jew Silverstein purchased WTC 6 weeks prior. First time the WTC was ever put into Private Hands. Friends with Israeli Prime Ministers & Intelligence Services, along with Fed Reserve President & World Bank Presidents.
    3. Zionist Jew Frank Lowy paid $127 million in May 2001 for a 99-year lease on the retail area beneath the New York World Trade Center. Member of the Golani Brigade & fought in the Israeli war of independence.
    4. Zionist Jew Ronald S. Lauder was key individual who lobbied for the privatization of the WTC and the former Air Cadet base at Stewart, N.Y where two of the planes oddly converged and where the Boeing military drones were switched . Lauder has funded a school for the Mossad in Herzliya, Israel.
    5. Airline Security Company at BOTH the Boston & Newark airports on 9-11 was a wholly-owned subsidiary of an Israeli company (ICTS). Most employees were ex- Shin Bet agents.
    6. Security at the WTC was run by Kroll Associates, owned by Jules Kroll & Jerome Hauer (BOTH Jews). Hauers mother involved in the creation & maintenance of the State of Israel.
    7. Zionist Jew Philip Zelikow (Jewish Dual Citizen of Israel) wrote the fraudulent 9 11 Commission Report.
    8. Zionist Jew, Richard Perle, Chairman of Pentagons Defense Policy Board, was expelled from Sen. Henry Jacksons office in the 1970s after NSA caught him passing highly classified documents to Israel.
    9. Dual Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff was assistant attorney general for the criminal division of the Justice Department; later, Director of Homeland Security.
    10. Israeli messaging service Odigo sent AT LEAST 2 Israelis prior warnings on 9 11, 2 hours prior to attack. Odigo has offices in New York & in Herzliya, Israel. Herzliya happens to be the Head Quarters of Mossad.
    11. Zionist Jew Pete Zalewski was the air traffic controller responsible for 2 of the planes on 911 & another plane full of top Pakistani military officials whose plane (Egyptian Fl990) crashed 2 years prior to 911.
    12. Israeli Mossad Jews caught & arrested filming & celebrating WTC prior to & after 1st plane hits WTC. Jumping up & down, lighting lighters & holding them up in air.
    13. Ted Olsen’s wife supposedly placed an impossible cell phone call from on the plane during 9 11, Ted Olsen was Israeli Spy Jonathon Pollard’s attorney.
    14. Israeli Mossad Jews caught with explosives near George Washington Bridge on 9 11.
    15. Zionist Jew Alan D. Ratners Metals Management merged with the SIMS group & the Hugo Neu Corporation & sold over 50,000 tons of crime scene evidence.
    16. Over 60 Israeli spies arrested on 9 11 & days afterwards.
    17. Zionist Jew Adam Pearlman is the AlQaeda spokesman. Lived with grandfather prior to joining AlQaeda, grandfather on board of ADL & huge Israeli supporter. His father helped run the Hippie Movement in SoCal then moved family to run a Kosher farm.
    18. S.I.T.E. website releases AlQaeda tapes but is owned by an Iraqi Jew who was in Israeli IDF. Her father was an Iraqi Jew & was sentenced to hanging after being caught SPYING FOR ISRAEL in the 1967 war.
    19. Zionist Jew Dov Zakheim was CEO of SPC International which developed Remote Control Flying Technology & leases Boeing 767 refuel tankers, the same planes used on 9 11. He also authored PNAC & was Comptroller of Pentagon when $2.3 Trillion went missing.
    20. According to FBI, in the Year 2000 Israeli Mossad had penetrated secret communications throughout the Clinton administration, even Presidential phone lines.
    21. After 9 11 Israeli Prime Minister Sharon said: We Jews own America & the Americans know it.
    22. Popular Mechanics so-called (Debunking 9 11 Lies) article had as its senior researcher Benjamin Chertoff, the cousin of Dept of Homeland Security Head Michael Chertoff at the time, Israeli dual citizen.
    23. Israeli Mossad pretends to be Al Qaeda in Palestine but is caught by the Palestinian Authority in 2002.
    24. October 10, 2001 (2) Israelis arrested inside Mexican Congress building with explosives, detonators & guns.
    25. November 2, 2001: FBI Fury As Israeli citizens With US Nuke Plans & Valid Israeli Passports Escape custody.
    26. Israeli citizen Philip Zelikow led the 9 11 Commission Report.
    27. US Army released on 10 Sept 2001 a study on Israel, which said: Of the MOSSAD, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS Army Officers say: Wildcard. Ruthless & cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces & make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.
    28. Israeli Mossad Motto: “By way of Deception, thou shalt do war.” (Motto Removed prior to 9 11).
    29. Bin Laden constantly denied committing 9 11, until 4 days before the 2004 election. Video considered fake.
    30. Ehud Barak, the prime minister of Israel until March of 2001, came to the U.S. shortly after leaving office. He came, ostensibly, to work as a special advisor for Electronic Data Systems and as a consultant with SCP Partners, a Mossad-run private equity company focused on “security related” work. SCP Partners did business with Metallurg Holding, Inc., as well as Advanced Metallurgical Group, both sharing the same Wayne, PA address. AMG specializes in the production of the same super-thermite used to collapse the three skyscrapers on 9/11.

  • 130 million jews on earth? can anyone believe jews increased from 9 million in 1948 to 130 million? i think not

    • I know many Jews that do not identify themselves as Jews, especially on any kind of survey or questionnaire. In my opinion, based on living in an area that is heavily Jewish, I think most Jews are not officially known as Jews. The census does not know they are Jews. Who really knows how many there are. Certainly many more than the official count.

  • For the last thousand years the liberal Christians have covered for the collapsing jewish culture until today they are a totally fabricated armed camp. Supported with theft, scams and armed murder through proxy they are the death culture we have always thought impossible.

  • Fight the worst Jewish weapon extant: Freemasonry: All the gentile following Jewish orders for the “Thirty Coins” reward. You can see the Jew performing as ordered in the criminal, but you just can´t change somebody that was born with a criminal design on the other hand, gentiles doing the job for the Jew are more guilty because they did have choice but decided to second the Jewish plans. Whatever we can say its closer but on dead center regarding Jewish condition: Masonry its the core thinking of Judaism and gentile masons are correctly identified by the French as “synthetic Jews”.

  • I’m utterly sick to death of the Jewish agenda. I’m also sick of the fact that they permeate and taint every facet of our lives. I sincerely hope they feck off.

  • Andy never really got to make his point. The radio host skillfully/deceitfully kept interrupting Andy the caller and asking him stupid questions – “what era”, “name one”. None of these questions were relevant or required at that point. However, that re-inforced the point that Andy was making – free speech is not allowed on certain topic – lots of distractions from the host.

  • This show the delusional brainwashing of the lock in step people who believe themselves to be Jews.
    This proves, once again, that all Jews are trained to help Jewish Organized Crime, with their diabolical plans for the world and enslavement of humanity.

    In the Past the Jews were able to trick the stupid masses and stay hidden in the shadows.
    Today the Jews continue to trick the stupid masses, but the people who see threw them have greater access to those stupid masses with the truth.

    Damn that internet!

    Considering that these delusional people actually think they are a Superior race, chosen by an imagined creator to rule over everyone else, I can safely say; Their is no such thing as a good Jew!

    • I had read a peice about the fact that Jews carry 75% of the neanderthal gene to this day …is why their high sex drive their aggressiveness…hooked noses..and their neanderthal similarities

  • There is first century Judaism of Jesus and His disciples and there is the man made invention of Talmudism by the synagogue of Satan. The latter is a hostile reaction to the revelation of Jesus the Messiah, the Redeemer of the World. Don’t blanket blame Judaism for the sins of Talmudism or of Zionism.

  • Jews can be brilliant, but they can be incredibly myopic & overreaching as well.
    By this Jewish group demanding to have the caller identified & arrested, they have proven him right!
    Thanks to the net, we’re no longer limited to being spoonfed pro-Jewish baloney on “The electric Jew” (TV)
    The net removes their total control of information & is driving this chosen tribe nucking futs!

  • I just went to listen to the section of that podcast in question. The podcast stopped just prior to that part and on the screen read: Sorry, you don’t have enough bandwidth to play this right now.

    I’ve never had a message like that appear on my screen listening to a podcast – ever, FWIW.

  • what’s this a Caller speaks the Truth! AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Silly Jews alwasy me me me me….pathetic just like the lies that can’t stand the test of time.

  • Quote: Jews Demand Caller Exposing Jewish Supremacy Be Identified, Arrested & tried by a Talmudic-Sharia court !
    Behead those that insult Jews !!

  • I must compliment this site’s use of provocative images. The image accompanying this article on your splash page (but not included on the actual story page) is hysterically funny. It depicts a bloated Elder of Zion drooling over the Earth he has ingested. Would love to see the full image. I wonder if these images were printed on T shirts whether anyone would buy them?

  • What i don’t get is that Russia has S-400 misiles in Syria and yet they allow Israel to bomb inside Syria at will so can we trust Mr Putin and Russia and why does Russia Today not address this isue.

    Jewish people demanding rights above the rest of us will only invite more hate towards them and i for one will not be silenced about bankers being behind much of the trouble we see in our world today and a lot of jewish people are with me on that one.

  • Oh but they have reason to fear. They have always been paranoid about everyone hating them and wanting them dead, and now its finally happened. They’ve stabbed the last victims in the back. The USA and England were foolish to give harbor to these rats. They are all bad and good for nothing. There are probably less than 25 millions of these things in the Entire World. It used to puzzle me how they can have stolen all this wealth and have such a ridiculously small population. Now I know, they’re all “gay” (sic).
    They have to be careful. They have to keep their scam a secret. They are so few and so weak and nowhere near as smart as you. In truth, this whole problem could disappear forever in a day, if just a small percentage of their victims picked up weapons and ended them permanently. As cowardly as they are, you could probably use pitchforks or baseball bats.

  • We should call them the Destructives, in lieu of Jews, Zionists, Israelis.

    How would that be anti Semitic ?

  • KingEdwardthe1wasRight1290

    The Jews are in England Illegally

    On the 18th of July 1290, by a royal proclamation, King Edward I expelled all Jews forever from England. Writs were sent out to the sheriffs of the English shires informing them that by royal edict all Jews were to leave the English realm before November 1st 1290, any who remained were liable to be executed. The population and parliament reacted with relief and great joy (Calendar of Close Rolls, 18 Edward I, Public Records Office).

    Since this particular NSV Report is being sent to a number of Jewish “Holocaust” survivors, journalists and government officials in England, we are providing herein some background history regarding England’s current law (King Edward I’s Edict of Expulsion of the Jews) in the hope that the English people, who are also our people, will have more insight regarding the Jewish expulsion. Obviously, England’s ZOG and our ZOG will do their utmost to circumvent any existing laws in order to have their own way, but if enough potential jurors become knowledgeable enough, smart enough and angry enough, then perhaps a defendant can get more justice in the courts than he now does.

    In 1190 AD, Bury St. Edmunds became the first town in England to formally expel the Jew. This example was followed by Leicester in 1231, Newcastle upon Tyne, Wycombe, the County of Warwick and parts of East Anglia in 1234, Southampton in 1236, Northamptonshire in 1237, Berkhamstead in 1242, Newbury with Speenhamland in 1243, Bridgnor in 1274 and Cambridge in 1275. Other towns in England and Wales which expelled the Jews include Beaumaris, Newborough, Canarvon, Criccieth, Harlech, Bala, Conway, Rhuddlan, Flint, Derby, Romsey and Winchelsea.

    In an attempt to solve the problem of “anti-Semitism,” King Edward I passed in 1275 the Statutem de Judeismo (Laws or Statutes regarding Jewry), a set of laws commonly known as the “Anti-Usury Laws.” These laws outlawed the lending and borrowing of money for unproductive purposes. Jewish historian Cecil Roth, in his book A History of the Jews in England, admitted that these special privileges were “an amazing concession” because it was probably the first example of “affirmative action” or “positive discrimination.” This set of laws was remarkable because King Edward I did not merely outlaw the lending and borrowing of money for unproductive purposes but granted special licenses to the Jew in order to encourage him to take up farming and any craft.

    However, the Jew never took advantage of these opportunities, choosing instead to continue with such parasitic practices as usury, clipping the coin (paring the silver off the coins which debased the currency), desecrating the host and ritually murdering Christian children every Passover, as the Jew is instructed to do in the Talmud. If anyone thinks that this was simply a medieval problem, it should be remembered that when Henry Ford was accused of being an “anti-Semite” for having publicized the Jew’s thoroughly unproductive and parasitic nature, he offered a reward of $1,000 (a considerable sum at the time) to anyone who could show him a Jewish farmer. The reward was never collected.

    King Edward I permanently banished the Jews from England in 1290. After the Jan/Mar ‘92 NSV Report was published, one of our associates made a trip to the University of Southern California Law School and sent us a copy of the actual wording of King Edward I’s Edict of Expulsion of the Jews in 1290. The Edict of Expulsion of 1290 reads:

    “Eodem anno omnes Judei, cum eorum bonis, filiis, et uxoribus, circa festum Omnium Sanctorum, terram Angliae et Aquitaniae, concedente rege Edwardo, exulantur.”

    This is translated by Dir. Cooper as:

    “To the same end [in reference to a tax levy in the previous sentence which is not included here] in the year, all Jews, with their goods, children and wives, around the holiday of All Saints [All Saints’ Day is November 1st], are banished from the land of England and of Aquitania [the southwest part of what is now France between the Loire River and Pyrenees Mountains], King Edward having conceded.”

    The above sentence says a lot – not only for English history but this situation has repeated itself elsewhere in Europe from the middle ages to the present time. You see, the word “concedente” implies that the king reluctantly yielded to pressure from his advisers and subjects. In other words, the king was not the motivating factor behind the Edict of Expulsion. Most probably, the king was informed in no uncertain terms that unless the Jews were expelled, he would face a violent revolution which would not only result in the expulsion of the Jews but also the execution of the king, his family and loyal backers.

    So the king conceded to the Edict of Expulsion and thus ordered his Jewish friends, allies, business partners and co-conspirators out of English territory. To ease the pain of his former Jewish associates, the king not only allowed the Jews to keep the money which they obtained from usury and coin-clipping, and any belongings that they could carry (all Jewish owned real estate, synagogues, cemeteries went to the king), but the king also levied a tax onto the English people to pay for the Jews’ transportation out of England. (Note: From the medieval ages to the present time, national leaders always deny a Jewish problem but eventually the people reach a point where they no longer believe the lies of their leaders and proceed to give an ultimatum to these leaders – Jews out or revolution. Faced with such an ultimatum, the leaders almost always yield to the desires of the people.)

    Most of the Jews were expelled but a minority chose to remain in England by agreeing to convert to Roman Catholicism. However, it soon became apparent that the “conversos” were not sincere in their desire to convert. So, in 1358, King Edward III needed to re-apply the Edict of Expulsion of 1290. The same situation arose in 1609 when James I was forced to expel the “refugees” from Spain and Portugal whose perfidy exposed them as being Jewish.

    It is important to note that the Statutem de Judeismo of 1275, the Edict of Expulsion of 1290 and the Edict of 1596 (issued to prevent negroes from ever setting foot on British soil) are Royal Edicts. They became permanent laws when the monarch at the time exercised the Royal Prerogative. When the monarch exercises the Royal Prerogative, it is like the Pope issuing an Encyclical. The monarch can never be overruled.

    Any law which is issued through the Royal Prerogative can only be changed by a subsequent monarch, regardless of anything said or done by the House of Commons or House of Lords. There is no “statute of limitations” concerning a Royal Edict. A Royal Edict is a permanent law which must be obeyed to the letter by all people in England forever. Every Jewish history book admits that the Edict of Expulsion is still in force.

    The Jew desperately wants the law changed but does not want to publicize the matter for this will draw attention to the reasons why the laws were issued in the first place. As we all know, those reasons are as valid today as they were centuries ago. One would think that the Jew might try to take the hint and act like a normal human being but this would mean giving up the lending of money for unproductive purposes (usury) etc. So the Jew tries to destroy the Royal Prerogative by trying to destroy the national sovereignty of England and every other nation by corrupting and undermining every nation within the bounds of Christendom by instituting a Zionist Occupation Government (ZOG). Those who are naive enough to think that this explanation is a “Jewish conspiracy theory” should be informed that the editorial of the Jewish Chronicle of February 23, 1990, titled “One Europe” stated:

    “It is becoming almost a self-evident truth that our future collective security – from economical and ecological disaster as much as from military cataclysm – can be assured only by pushing further and faster for one world. One Europe, in which the Soviet Union and its former satellites are equal partners, or at least close associates, is the first logical step. But time is pressuring faster than nation-states can cope with the notion of change… Can we get there in time?”

    It is important to consider the Statutem de Judeismo of 1275 and the Edict of Expulsion of 1290 not as laws passed suddenly to try to solve forever the Jewish problem but rather as part of a series of laws passed throughout the 13th century to deal with the subversive influence of the perfidious Jew. The first set of national laws passed in England was the Magna Carta of 1215 which to this day is the source of all laws in the English-speaking world, including the American Constitution. Of the 63 clauses of the Great Charter, numbers 10 and 11 deal with the Jewish problem:

    •(10) If anyone who has borrowed from the Jews any sum, great or small, dies before it is repaid, the debt shall not bear interest as long as the heir is under age, of whomsoever he holds; and if the debt falls into our hands, we will not take anything except the principal mentioned in the bond,

    •(11) And if anyone dies indebted to the Jews, his wife shall have her dower and pay nothing of that debt; and it the dead man leaves children who are under age, they shall be provided with necessaries befitting the holding of the deceased; and the debt shall be paid out of the residue, reserving, however, service due to the lords of the land; debts owing to others than Jews shall be dealt with in like manner (Encyclopedia Britannica translation).

    In 1981, Comay† wrote in another book, The Diaspora Story (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London):

    “To this day the expulsion decree… has not been cancelled, nor has there been any formal enactment permitting Jews to return to England and live there…”

    Enforcement or public discussion of the law does not contravene the Race Relations Act. To say that the Jew residing in England is an illegal alien is not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of fact. It is a point of law.

  • KingEdwardthe1wasRight1290

    1275 King Edward I grants Jews licences for trading and farming in the ‘Statutum de Judeismo’ (commonly known as the Anti-Usury Laws) in an attempt to discourage Jews from money-lending and coin-clipping. It was the first Act in which the new Commons took part, in conjunction with the King.

    1290 To great popular acclaim, King Edward I issued an Edict declaring that all Jews must leave England by 1 November. The wardens of the Cinque Ports were to supervise their departure and see that the poor were able to obtain cheap tickets. No man was allowed to “injure, harm, damage or grieve” them. They were to be allowed to take all their cash and personal property, but their bonds and real estate reverted to the Crown, while synagogues became Church property.

    1655 Demurrer by William Prynne was published, in which Prynne, a distinguished lawyer of Lincoln’s Inn, argued forcefully against Jewish readmission, quoting numerous authorities that having been banished by the King and a full Commons, and “never since could they obtain any priviledge to return hither again,” the banishment was of permanent effect.

    1656 Cromwell, having executed King Charles I, readmits the Jews. The order leading to the execution of the King was drawn up by a Dutch Jew, Isaac Dorislaus, and approved by a rigged court. According to tradition, Cromwell had intended to sell St. Paul’s Cathedral to the Jews for use as their central synagogue.

    1753 A Jewish Naturalization Bill (“the Jew Bill”) granted naturalization to Jews on personal application to Parliament.

    1754 The Jewish Naturalization Bill was repealed following public demonstrations and protest.

    1858 The law was changed so that Jews could become Members of Parliament, they formerly having refused to swear an oath “upon the true faith of a Christian.”

    1936 The first Public Order Act. Effective from 1 January 1937, it banned political uniforms and paramilitary groups. The law is now very arbitrarily enforced.

    1965 The first Race Relations Act was introduced into the House of Commons by Sir Frank Soskice, an immigrant Russian Jew.

    1968 The Runnymede Trust was founded by Anthony Lester and Jim Rose, both Jews, a few weeks after Enoch Powell’s ‘rivers of blood’ speech in Birmingham.

    1976 The Jewish Chronicle of 17 January 1975 reported that “Section 6 of the Race Relations Act, 1965, dealing with incitement to racial hatred, may be amended and strengthened following representations made to the [Jewish] Attorney General, Mr. Sam Silkin, QC, by the Board of Deputies of British Jews. In the view of the board’s Jewish Defence and Group Relations Committee, the weakness of the Section is its present requirement that ‘intent’ to stir up racial hatred must be proven for any prosecution to succeed.” The Editorial expressed satisfaction with the result, but said that it “would better have been achieved by less publicised means.” The Race Relations Act duly removed the need to prove ‘intent’ in prosecutions for ‘Incitement to Racial Hatred’ and was passed in the House of Commons with only 132 of its 635 Members being present.

    1985 In 1994, during a Commons debate to introduce further race relations legislation into law, Harry Cohen, Jewish MP for Leyton and Wanstead said, “In 1985, I introduced the Racial Harassment Bill under the ten-minute rule. It was the first Bill presented to Parliament to make racial attack a criminal offence.”

    1986 Throughout the 1970s and 1980s Neville Nagler, a synagogue official, was the head of the Home Office department responsible for race relations matters. Whenever a Cabinet Minister made a speech on the subject, notes for the text were always drafted by Nagler, who routinely consulted officials at the Jewish Board of Deputies such as Geoffrey Bindman and Anthony Lester. The 1986 Public Order Act was placed before parliament by the Conservative Home Secretary, a Jewish immigrant from Lithuania, Leon Brittanisky, also known as Leon Brittan, assisted by his cousin, another Lithuanian Jew, Malcolm Rivkind, also know as Malcolm Rifkind. Official commentary on the law explicitly refers to the Runnymede Trust.

    1998 A further raft of race law was introduced, overseen this time by a part-Jewish Home Secretary, Jack Straw. Around 27 offences carry increased penalties if the offence is deemed to be “racially aggravated.” The maximum penalty for ‘Incitement to Racial Hatred’ was raised from two to seven years.

    2006 According to Jewish sources, there are at least 59 Jewish Members of Parliament, with Britain being second only to Israel for its proportion of Jewish legislators. Britain has a Jewish-financed Prime Minister and a Jewish Attorney General. New legislation is being introduced so fast that legal libraries cannot keep up, and government ministers are facing prosecution for breaking their own laws. Jewish press reports in September 2006 admitted that the Edict of Explusion is still valid, with Israeli historian Ori Katzir saying “All that needs to be done is for the queen to sign a contradictory decree, and this has never been done. I wonder when the Israeli government will demand that the UK will have Queen Elizabeth II sign such a decree and revoke the edict.”

  • KingEdwardthe1wasRight1290

    Jewish Ritual Murder in England Before 1290

    Arnold S. Leese

    The first known case occurred in 1144; after that, cases cropped up from time to time until the Jews were expelled from the realm by Edward I. The most famous of these incidents was that of Little St. Hugh of Lincoln in 1255. I record these cases in chronological order; and I do not deny the possibility that some of them, in which details are lacking, were “trumped up” ones, where death may have been due to causes other than ritual murder and the Jews blamed for it; but the case of St. Hugh, particularly, was juridically decided, and the Close and Patent Rolls of the Realm record definitely cases at London, Winchester and Oxford. There seems no reason to doubt that many cases of ritual murder have been unsuspected and even undiscovered.

    1144, Norwich. A twelve year-old boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine; and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne, but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial.

    In J. C. Cox’s Norfolk Churches, vol. II, p. 47, as also in the Victoria County History of Norfolk, 1906, vol.. II, is an illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the ritual murder of St. William; the screen itself is in Loddon Church, Norfolk, unless the power of Jewish money has had it removed. No-one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say it was not a ritual murder. The Jew, C. Roth, in his The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew (1935) says: “Modern enquirers, after careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and was buried prematurely by his relatives.” How these modern enquirers arrived at a conclusion like that after all these years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest that its ministers would allow the boy’s death to be celebrated as the martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and piercing of the side. And why the relatives should bury the boy in a sack and then dig it up and hang it in a tree would puzzle even a Jew to explain.

    John Foxe’s Acts and Monuments of the Church records this ritual murder, as did the Ballandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish ritual murder; in the Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew!) it is made clear that his career, quite apart from this ritual murder case, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage.

    1160, Gloucester. The body of a child named Harold was found in the river with the usual wounds of crucifixion. Sometimes wrongly dated 1168. (Recorded in Monumenta Germania Historica, vol. VI (Erfurt Annals); Polychronicon, R. Higdon; Chronicles, R. Grafton, p. 46.)

    1181, Bury St. Edmunds. A child called Robert was sacrificed at Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there was supposed to cause miracles. (Authority: Rohrbacher, from the Chronicle of Gervase of Canterbury.)

    1192, Winchester. A boy crucified. Mentioned in the Jewish Encyclopaedia as being a false charge. Details lacking.

    1232, Winchester. Boy crucified. Details lacking. (Mentioned in Hyamson’s History of the Jews in England; also in Annals of Winchester; and conclusively in the Close Roll 16, Henry III, m.8, 26.6.1232.)

    1235, Norwich. In this case, Jews stole a child and hid him with a view to crucifying him. Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates of date 1847, says of this case, “They [the Jews] circumcise and attempt to crucify a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine of 20,000 marks.” (Further authority Huillard Breolles, Grande Chronique, III, 86; also Close Roll, 19 Henry III, m.23.)

    1244, London. A child’s body found unburied in the cemetery of St. Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried with great pomp in St. Paul’s. (Authority: Social England, vol. I, p. 407, edited by H. D. Traill.)

    1255, Lincoln. A boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy’s mother found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Jopin or Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed, did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for the crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body, and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who was executed.

    Hugh was locally beatified, and his tomb may still be seen in Lincoln Cathedral, but the Jewish Money Power has evidently been at work, for between 1910 and 1930 a notice was fixed above the shrine as follows: “The body of Hugh was given burial in the Cathedral and treated as that of a martyr. When the Minster was repaved, the skeleton of a small child was found beneath the present tombstone. There are many incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and the existence of similar stories in England and elsewhere points to their origin in the fanatical hatred of the Jews of the Middle Ages and the common superstition, now wholly discredited, that ritual murder was a factor of Jewish Paschal Rites. Attempts were made as early as the 13th century by the Church to protect the Jews against the hatred of the populace and against this particular accusation.”

    At a visit to Lincoln of the Jewish Historical Society, in 1934, the Mayor, Mr. G. Deer, said to them: “That he [St. Hugh] was done to death by Jews for ritual purposes cannot be other than a libel based upon the prejudices and ignorance of an unenlightened age.” The Chancellor on the same occasion said: “It was quite obviously one of the very many cases of slander spread about the Jews from time to time. No doubt, the child died or fell down the well.”

    These people, Jews and Gentiles, bring no evidence whatever for their statement; it couldn’t have happened, they say. Why not?

    Was Henry III, weak in character as we know him to have been, ever charged with being an immoral man? Did the judges not examine the body, which was only four weeks dead? Is Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates (1847 edition) medieval and superstitious when it said of this case “They [the Jews] crucify a child at Lincoln, for which eighteen are hanged”? There are no ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’ here! Or does Copinus’s confession not tally with that of Theobald, quoted above in the first Norwich case? Copinus said, “For the death of this child, nearly all the Jews in England had come together and every town had sent deputies to assist in the sacrifice.”

    No-one questions the historical facts in this case; but Jews and Judaized Gentiles alike unite in denying the fact of ritual murder.

    Strack, in his The Jew and Human Sacrifice, written in defence of the Jews against the Blood Accusation, omits all mention of this famous case, which is the subject of the Prioress’s Tale in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales and is referred to in Marlowe’s Jew of Malta. Hyamson’s History of the Jews in England devotes the whole of Chapter IX to “Little St. Hugh of Lincoln,” showing the importance of the ritual murder issue in the Jewish mind today. (The following Close Rolls of the Realm refer to the case of St. Hugh: Henry III, 39, m.2, 7.10.1255; 39, m.2, 14.10.1255; 40, m.20, 24.11.1255; 40, m.13, 13.3.1256; 42, m.6, 19.6.1258. And the Patent Rolls, Henry III, 40, m.20, 26.11.1255; 40, m.19, 9.12.1255; 40, 27.3.1256; and 40, m.5, 20.8.1256.)

    1257, London. A child sacrificed. (Authority: Cluverius, Epitome Historiae p. 541.) Details lacking.

    1276, London. Boy crucified. (Authority: The Close Roll of the Realm, 4, Edward I, m.14, 3.3.1276.)

    1279, Northampton. A child crucified. Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates, 1847, says of this case: “They [the Jews] crucify a child at Northampton for which fifty are drawn at horses’ tails and hanged.” (Further authorities: Reiley, Memorials of London, p. 15; H. Desportes, Le Mystére du Sang.)

    1290, Oxford. The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, m.21, 21st June 1290, contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford.

    Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, then, every reason to believe that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in toleration.

    A similar ritual case was one of the main stimulants to the King and Queen of Spain to expel professing Jews from that country in 1492 (Leese: Jewish Ritual Murder, p. 20).

    The Jews, in attempting to escape responsibility for these deaths by ritual murder, do not hesitate to impugn the probity of two of the Kings of England, against whose moral character no-one else has dared to cast a slur. Here are some examples. Firstly the Jew Hyamson (in History of the Jews in England, 1928 edition, p. 21) wrote: “It has also been pointed out that the Blood Accusation was as a rule made at a time at which the Royal Treasury needed replenishing.” This foul accusation against men of upright character was repeated in the Jewish Chronicle Supplement, April 1936, p. 8 (speaking of the Lincoln case in the reign of Henry III): “Henceforth and especially under the zealously Christian Edward I, the Crown and its officers became almost a worse peril to the Jews than mobs intent on loot and led on by fanatic priests and knightly spendthrifts who had borrowed Jewish money. When 18th century writers of history began to examine the old records in a new sceptical temper some may be found venturing on such unkind surmises as that the alleged crucifixions of Christian children only seemed to happen when kings were short of money.”

    To deny that the cases of St. William of Norwich and St. Hugh of Lincoln were Jewish ritual murders is to accuse certain English Kings, certain English Clergy, and certain English administrators, known to be men of good morals, of murdering and torturing Jews to get their money, after accusing them of horrible crimes. In the case of St. Hugh, the sentence was juridical; in the case of St. William, the mob took the matter into their own hands because the Sheriff would take no action himself.

    Whom do you believe – the Jews or the English?

    “It is difficult to refuse all credit to stories so circumstantial and so frequent.” So says Social England concerning ritual murders in England (vol. I, p. 407, 1893, edited by H. D. Traill).

    A significant fact is that Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates, at least up to 1847, quoted the ritual murders in Norman and Plantagenet England as undisputed facts. In later editions in the sixties, all mention of them is extirpated! We may take it that the Jewish Money Power began to dictate to the Press in England somewhere in the fifties of the last century.

  • KingEdwardthe1wasRight1290

    William Prynne: Fighter Against Readmission

    By the mid 17th century, England had been without Jews (apart from a few infiltrators posing as Gentiles) for over 350 years, since their banishment by good King Edward I in 1290. This had been inspired by their persistent wrongdoing, including extortionate money-lending and clipping the gold and silver coinage. The banishment had been greeted with universal rejoicing by the thankful English people.

    Cromwell wanted to accede to Jewish appeals for readmission, spiced with financial assistance for his cause, but was sensitive to public opposition to the idea, plentifully shown during an assembly to discuss the subject which he convened. So he abstained from any formal revocation of the banishment, and instead allowed Jews to enter the country on the sly, contrary to the law; and this has remained the position up to today, various parliamentary measures in the past 200 years giving recognition to this return by stealth without ever formally repealing the expulsion.

    William Prynne was a distinguished lawyer of Lincolns Inn, London, in the forefront of resistance to Cromwell’s proposal for readmission. His book Demurrer was published in 1655. In it he cited various authorities for his contention that the expulsion had been by royal decision in Parliament, not royal edict outside Parliament; even though in those days of royal government an edict was fully as much a promulgation of law as a statute enacted in Parliament.

    He cited in support of this Henry de Knyghton, a Canon of Leicester in Richard II’s reign (1377 – 1399) whom he termed “a most diligent Antiquary” and quoted him as speaking of “the same Parliament that the Jews were exiled.” Next he cited “Our learned John Bale” that “by the publick Edict of the Parliament assembled in London, and by a publick decree; They were all commanded to depart the Realm with their goods…” Next he cited Raphael Holnshed’s Chronicles, Vol. 3, p. 285: “In the same year was a Parliament holden at Westminster… It was also decreed that all the Jews should avoid out of the Land… and so herupon were the Jews banished out of all the King’s Dominions: and never since could they obtain any priviledge to return hither again.”

    Prynne then, on pages 48 and 49, summarized his knowledge as follows:–

    1. That all the Jews were then banished out of England, never to return again, at the special instance, and request of the Commons in two several Parliaments, as an intollerable grievance and oppression under which they groaned.

    2. That the principle grounds of this their perpetual banishment were, their infidelity, Usury, forgeries of Charters, clipping and falsifying of monies, by which they prejudiced the King and kingdom and much oppressed and impoverished the pople [sic].

    3. That this their banishment was so acceptable to all the people, who oft-times pressed it in Parliament that they gave the King a Fifth and Fifteenth part of their moveables to speed and execute it.

    4. That this their banishment was by the unanimous desire, Judgement, Edict, and Decree both of the King and his Parliament; and not by the King alone: and this Banishment, total, of them all, and likewise final, Never to return into England. Which Edict and Decree not now extant in our Parliament Rolls (many of which are lost) not printed Statutes; yet it is mentioned by all these Authorities.

    He added to this his important conclusion (p. 50) that the banishment is of permanent effect, and not restricted to the Jews involved in 1290:–

    So none banished the Realm by judgement or Act of Parliament, can, may or ought, by the fundamental and known common Laws of England, to be restored and recalled again, but only by a like judgement, Act and Restitution in full Parliament…

    Therefore the Jews being so long since by Judgement, Edict and Decree both of the King and Parliament for ever banished out of England (never since repealed or reversed) neither may, nor can by Law be readmitted, reduced into England again, but by common consent and Act of Parliament: which I conceive they will never be able to obtain.

    The Jews in England, if not the whole of Britain, today are illegal immigrants. The enforcement of the Expulsion is the only satisfactory solution to Britain’s grievous Jewish Problem.

  • Jews (infesting comments) Demand Blog Exposing Jewish Supremacy Be (Ideologically) Arrested

  • Are you all people with your comments idiots? What Jews have done wrong to you that you hate them so much? Is it out of your envy, caused by your inability to make so many discoveries, which Jews invented, which the humanity uses for its good? Medicine, science, technology, leadership in all aspects of life, which Jews invented and anti-Semites use them in everyday life? Shame on you! You are absolutely ignorant and have no gratitude for everything Jews have done for us, regardless of any people’s religion. Do not forget, that first Christians were all Jews, and Jesus Christ also was a Jew. By insulting Jews you insulting our God, remember that! And do not start another anti-Semitic campaign, if you do not want to be punished by our God.

    • KingEdwardthe1wasRight1290

      The Jews are Canaanites, not Israelites. The Canaanite Jews are The Devil’s Seed – The Tares.

      o The Israelites (13 Tribes in all) are the forefathers of following nations:
      Ephraim = England and Her Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and South Africa (Now stolen)
      Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA
      Simeon = Scotland and Scottish descendants everywhere.
      Levi = Wales, Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.
      Judah (Royalty) = Northern Ireland, Scotland and some still dispersed in Western Europe with some in Germany.
      Dan = Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere
      Reuben = Northern Gallic France
      Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon = Holland
      Gad = Belgium
      Issachar = Switzerland
      Naphtali = Finland
      Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark
      Asher = Sweden
      13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

      • Based on the zodiac – 13 in total because of Gemini the Twins. Each ‘tribe’ represents one of the signs of the zodiac. It was common in ancient societies to fashion or model their society/nation on the pattern of the heavens.

    • KingEdwardthe1wasRight1290

      “Anti-Semitism is nothing but the antagonistic attitude produced in non-Jews by the Jewish group. This is a normal social reaction.”
      – Albert Einstein

      – When a man commits sodomy with a boy under nine years of age, it “is not deemed as pederasty” (Sanhedrin, 54b,55a).
      – Sexual intercourse with a boy under the age of eight is lawful since it isn’t fornication (Sanhedrin, 69b).
      1) ” Sanhedrin 54b.: A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old.“
      2) Kethuboth 11b. : When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.
      3) Yebamoth 98a. : All Gentile (Non-Jewish) children are animals.
      4) Baba Mezia 114a-114b. : Only Jews are human.
      Schene luchoth haberuth, p 250b. : Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew as a monkey to a human.
      Baba Mezia, 114b (page referrals). : The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts.
      5) Baba Kamma 113a.: Jews may use lies (subterfuges) to circumvent a Gentile (Non-Jew).
      6) Sanhedrin 57a. : A Jew need not pay a Gentile (Non-Jew) the wages owed him for work.
      7) Sepher Ikkarim III c 25. : It is permited to take the body and life of a Gentile (Non-Jew).
      8) Bammidber raba c 21 & jalkut 772.: Every Jew who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.
      9) It is lawful for a girl three years old to have sexual intercourse (Abodah Zarah, 37a; Kethuboth, 11b,39a; Sanhedrin, 55b,69a,b; Yebamoth, 12a,57b,58a,60b)
      10) Since all Gentiles are only animals, all Gentile children are bastards (Yebamoth, 98a). )

      “Ye are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do.

      He was a murderer from the beginning….”

      – St. John, viii, 44.

    • KingEdwardthe1wasRight1290

      “I wish to emphasise that I have done my research on the Jew Menace in the same scientific spirit as when I was investigating camel diseases in the world’s deserts. I have been after truth, not propaganda; in fact, I have investigated the diseases of the body politic!”

      Arnold S Leese

      Canaanite Jews are Hamitic, not Semitic so the anti-semitism trick is all Bull-shit mate, like the Einstein fraud. Oh vey.

  • How about we leave this matter before the Most High, and have Him intervene on this matter. Frankly it seems only right because their own ancient Holy scriptures attest to this comming intervention. Which by any measure is far worse than what any man can do. Many of us await the day of spectacle. Do you considder Enoch, the 7th after Adam, a Jew? Why cant we all just aspire to do the right things. To be hononrable and impecable decency. Love thy neighbour, as you love yourself. Be Upright and Righteous. Dont you like Genuine persons? I know I do.

  • A bit off topic but wanted to post this interesting article. MPs in the UK are to present a new bill to replace God save The Queen as English sports teams anthem. It has been suggested that the replacement anthem be Jerusalem and Cameron is in favour. I think it’s very revealing.