Interview With Black Trump Supporters Enrages Arianna Huffington

Huff Post

Popular Marxist mogul commissions screed against AFP, Diamond & Silk, Friend.

By Paul T. Angel & John Friend

The news and commentary website “The Huffington Post,” a bastion of the Marxist, anti-white media machine poisoning the minds of millions of Americans, regularly publishes hit pieces on American patriots and populists, denouncing them as “racist” and “anti-Semitic” for having the guts to confront taboo topics in an honest manner.

Unsurprisingly, “The Huffington Post” ran a particularly egregious attack on this newspaper following the publication of our interview with Diamond and Silk, the dynamic sisters from North Carolina who have gained national attention as a result of their provocative and hard-hitting YouTube videos supporting Donald Trump’s presidential candidacy. Lynette “Diamond” Hardaway and Rochelle “Silk” Richardson, who are black, have made numerous media appearances in recent months, and have built a massive following on social media and YouTube.

“Black Donald Trump Supporters Get Cozy With White Nationalist,” the headline reads on “The Huffington Post.” The article featured virtually every single Marxist buzzword designed to discredit and malign those of us who do not bow before the altar of political correctness. Reporter John Friend was denounced as a “Holocaust denier,” while AMERICAN FREE PRESS—which offers a lot more truth than “The Huffington Post” ever would dare to—was derided for prompting “racist and anti-Semitic views and conspiracy theories,” according to the article.

Following the publication of the hit piece, which also targeted Diamond and Silk, the outspoken sisters took to YouTube to address the controversy. In the video, which has close to 43,000 views as AFP goes to press, the sisters simply note that they spoke with a reporter who asked them for an interview.

Trump’s candidacy has generated extremely hostile and blatantly biased media coverage, particularly from leftist publications such as “The Huffington Post.” At the bottom of articles dealings with the controversial GOP frontrunner on the news website, an editor’s note appears stating:

Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims—1.6 billion members of an entire religion—from entering the U.S.

The biased, dishonest nature of “The Huffington Post’s” coverage of Trump’s presidential bid is not surprising when one pulls back the curtain on this popular news website that is geared toward young people.

Former employees of the “Post” have described the organization as “an essentially miserable place” to work with a “culture so brutal and toxic that it would meet with approval from committed sociopaths across the land.” Arianna Huffington, the co-founder and editor-in-chief of the “Post,” runs the organization in a Soviet-style manner, according to those who have worked there. Former employees claim she is a self-centered, self-important megalomaniac, who forces her “reporters” to pen fawning puff pieces on friends and others she believes will help her company. Even though “The Huffington Post” has never turned a profit since Mrs. Huffington founded it, the corporation made her a multi-millionaire when it was sold to Internet giant America Online (now known exclusively as AOL).

“Purges and show trials are common, especially if you’ve been hired on the basis that you might bring some journalistic firepower to the site,” writes a former employee. “The problem is that any authority those people amass is seen by Arianna as a threat to her position, and so the threats are eliminated. Knowing your place is the best way of getting ahead at HuffPost.”

The 65-year-old Huffington, born Ariadnē-Anna Stasinopoúlou, is no stranger to controversy. In 1981, the Greek native was accused of plagiarism for copying material for one of her books, which was settled out of court, and in 2011, a group of bloggers threatened to go on strike. A month later a $105 million class-action lawsuit was filed by a group of bloggers who were never paid for their work by the uber-rich plutocratic publisher.

Thankfully, the establishment media is being discredited and exposed on a daily basis, and Trump is playing a huge role in the process. Trump regularly criticizes the media, and boldly challenges reporters and interviewers during press conferences and in media appearances as no other political candidate has done. He has openly denounced political correctness as destroying America, and is threatening to further undermine the power and influence the mass media has over the average American’s perception of the world.

Dishonest establishment media outlets such as “The Huffington Post” are becoming more and more transparent in their attempts to enforce political correctness and demonize those of us willing to stand up for the truth. Expect more of the same in the coming weeks and months, especially as the 2016 presidential election continues to heat up. Also expect more and more Americans to turn to the alternative independent media, such as this newspaper, for their news and information.

Note that Arianna Huffington also demanded a despicable hit piece on Willis A. Carto be written after his death, sending reporters to Arlington National Cemetery to try to defame the longtime nationalist publisher who had earned the right to be buried there after receiving a Purple Heart and an infantry combat badge during his time in the U.S. military during WWII in the Pacific theater.

Mrs. Huffington, who is also listed as the author of several books in her online biography, has been at the center of accusations that she employed ghost writers to create the manuscripts for her. As the books appear to be reasonably well written, chances are she is not the actual author of them, but has used her considerable wealth to employ others to formulate her sentences.

It makes sense that Mrs. Huffington would be so sensitive to the issue of Revisionist World War II history. Her first husband, Henry Bernard Levin CBE (1928-2004), was a British Jew and a prominent journalist and television show host. Known for his satirical wit, Levin had to give up his journalistic career in 1997 after developing Alzheimer’s disease. One has to wonder if he was afflicted with bouts of dementia extending further back to the time when he proposed to Mrs. Huffington.


By her very condemnation of the open and honesty inquiry by top-notch scholars into controversial historical events, Mrs. Huffington shows her true colors. As beloved AFP journalist Michael Collins Piper once said, “You can judge books by their critics.” Thus, Mrs. Huffington’s blanket attacks on those who hold doubts about German history, for instance, reinforce the idea that there is something to hide or she is simply confessing her own ignorance of the facts.

For those of you who would like to find out more about World War II, THE BARNES REVIEW history magazine will send you a free catalog, listing over 35 books exposing alternative views about the war crimes of the Allies and the Axis powers before, during, and after the war.

Simply send a request for a catalog to THE BARNES REVIEW, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003 and include $1 for postage.

NB: This article was originally published by American Free Press on April 11, 2016. Subscribe to America’s last real newspaper today!

Subscribe to The Realist Report today, and support pro-White independent media!

Chip in for gas – $10 goes a long way! Enter your email below and donate now!


  • Why the Hitler ‘tache on Huffington’s face? It was never a good look.

    Why the association with these Black ladies unless the end goal is raceless?

    • The end goal is freedom of speech, freedom of expression and freedom of association, hopefully in every see-will-I’s-ed country in the world. After you establish that (not as easy as it sounds, in fact, it may be the hardest of all tasks, even in just “white” countries), you can have as many voluntary racialist associations as you want with as many people as you want. Non-initiation-of-Force the only law and immediate-forceful-defense of its violation the ONLY law, the natural law as Jefferson intended. But you can’t force anybody else to think and act the way you and your friends deem “moral,” if they have not physically or through the indirect force of fraud or media-monopoly-lies transgressed against your person or property.

      “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law’, because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” “No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him.” ~ Thomas Jefferson to Francis Gilmer, 1816

      See-will-I-zation is not a zero-sum game but a win-win dialectic. Might-makes-rights-because-rights-make-the-most-might is simple enough to understand even for macho types who think all is physical force and “law of the jungle.” Will-to-Power means will to rule (by initiated force) or will-to-lead (by example, creativity and productive ability) Parasitism and all other forms of tyranny are win-lose, they cannot be eliminated from human affairs but they can be minimized by promoting the correct t-roots or root ideas that do not poison all branches of the extended family into dysfunction. Any other “end goal” being strictly win-lose would be uncivilized and definitely un-American. Now, strictly apart from the mob-rule immorality of “democracy” even when not manipulated by elites through media-ownership, if you and every last individual in your group agree to be racist against all non-whites in your own extended region of full-property-ownership which you then deem a “new” country, that will also you be your right of free association. But as soon as you pass laws violating the natural rights (non-initiation of force & defense of this principle when violated) of even ONE individual in your group who does not agree with the law, in the name of any “higher” collective, including race and extended family, you become to that extent win-lose and tyrannical.

      Everyone, as in every last human being who can form higher metaphors and have “hues” and drive a car, etc., understands non-initiation-of-force or NIOF and immediate self-defense of it when violated when it comes to his or her own personal life. The only higher abstraction needed is to extend that to their entire family.

      P.S. Allowing people to have freedom of thought, expression and association does not in any way mean that any two hue-mans are equal in anything but basic humanity, including identical twins. If you WN’s want to draw the line of humanity between “white people” on the one hand and everyone else on the other, then you should never complain when people call you “supremacist,” since you want to apply completely different moralities to different races of human beings, just like the Judaics.

      Must Listen: Trevor LaBonte & Paul Topete on the Vinny Eastwood Show: Hitler vs the New World Order

      Must Listen. Max Igan – PsyOps, Circular Arguments & Belief Systems In An Unfree World

      “To know what actions are virtuous, and what vicious — in other words, to know what actions tend, on the whole, to happiness, and what to unhappiness — in the case of each and every man, in each and all the conditions in which they may severally be placed, is the profoundest and most complex study to which the greatest human mind ever has been, or ever can be, directed. It is, nevertheless, the constant study to which each and every man — the humblest in intellect as well as the greatest — is necessarily driven by the desires and necessities of his own existence. It is also the study in which each and every person, from his cradle to his grave, must necessarily form his own conclusions; because no one else knows or feels, or can know or feel, as he knows and feels, the desires and necessities, the hopes, and fears, and impulses of his own nature, or the pressure of his own circumstances.” — Lysander Spooner, “Vices Are Not Crimes”

      • P. P. S. the 4th requirement to add would be freedom of subconscious-to-conscious programming or freedom from media-monopoly and brainwashing. Freedom of choice is not valid when the subconscious has been manipulated through media to give you the false-dichotomies and false-paradigms of the narratives within which you are required to make that choice. Therefore freedom of choice and association is invalid if it does not include freedom from monopolized media. Even the best, most productive, creative and most “more-all” person should not be allowed to have full control over the subconscious-to-conscious programming of his customers or audience. Why? Because the free-choice of his audience to program their own subconscious by carefully choosing what to feed it and what not, is thus violated.

        • (continued . . . )

          Leadership vs rulership principle. The former seeks to lead, educate, inform, strengthen and protect (pro-tact & pro-tech) by voluntary association and when he produces results is followed (by those who fall lower and more fallow and therefore have something to gain by “fallow-ing) by those who seek similar results, the latter by forcing the “more-all” as understood by him, and as an “absolute,” down everyone’s throat.

          Since, no symbols or metaphors, i.e, the basic building blocks of all human languages including the mathematical and musical, can ever fully be the objects they represent, since no map is ever fully the territory it helps navigate, whether physical or spiritual, no “more-all-ity” or code of righteous actions (rite, ritual, following the proper rituals) to take or evil (anti-live) ones to avoid, can ever be absolute but only an ever-developing, ever-refinable guide to proper bee-hive-ior. This does not involve “compromise” of principles that have already proved quite fertile but obsessive temperance (adjusting of levels) without compromise, the ideal of the so-called “gentleman.”

          Therefore all the more reason to unite over one all-encompassing principle (NIOF & IFDOVNIOF, immediate forceful defense of violations of NIOF) in all see-will-I-zations. How else will you ever see your “free” will in action in perfect balance with the free-will of others, as all sides learn to temper rather than compromise only ONE law, the only natural law that has been identified and is understood by all: NIOF?

          “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.” – Leo Tolstoy

          “Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people.” — Socrates

          “Be humble, if thou would’st attain to wisdom. Be humbler still, when wisdom thou hast mastered.” — Helena Petrovna Blavatsky

          “Men are wise in proportion, not to their experience, but to their capacity for experience.” — James Boswell

          “Learning sleeps and snores in libraries, but wisdom is everywhere, wide awake, on tiptoe.” — Josh Billings

          “Talent is God given. Be humble. Fame is man-given. Be grateful. Conceit is self-given. Be careful.” — John Wooden

          “Only the wise possess ideas; the greater part of mankind are possessed by them.” — Samuel Taylor Coleridge

          “There are two rules to living well. The first is, don’t sweat the little sh*t. The second is, it’s all little sh*t.” — David Lee Roth

          “Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place.” — Joseph Goebbels

          “If a man is a gentleman, he knows quite enough, and if he is not a gentleman, whatever he knows is bad for him.” — Oscar Wilde

          “The character of a gentleman [I take it] may be explained nearly thus: A blackguard is a fellow who does not care whom he offends; a clown is a blockhead who does not know when he offends; A gentleman is one who understands and shows every mark of deference to the claims of self-love in others, and exacts it in return from them.” — William Hazlitt, in The Ideal of a Gentleman: Or, A Mirror for Gentlefolks

          • (continued . . . )

            “The individual’s adherence to his group is ‘conscious’ because he is aware of it and recognizes it, but it is ultimately involuntary because he is trapped in a dialectic and in a group that leads him unfailingly to his adherence. His adherence is also ‘intellectual’ because he can express his conviction clearly and logically, but it is not genuine because the information, the data, the reasoning, that have led him to adherence to the group were themselves deliberately falsified in order to lead him there.” ~ Jacques Ellul – “Propaganda, The Formation of Men’s Attitudes”


            To avoid these kinds of “dialectical” traps, defense of freedom-of-choice must always include subconscious self-defense and not just defense just at the tip of the “conscious” iceberg which is moved, formed, shaped and calibrated by the vastly more sensitive and powerful “unconscious.”

            “The individual who burns with desire for action but does not know what to do is a common type in our society. He wants to act for the sake of justice, peace, progress, but does not know how. If propaganda can show him this ‘how’ then it has won the game; action will surely follow.” — Jacques Ellul

            “Doubt is not a pleasant condition but certainty is absurd.” — Voltaire

      • Neg said, “The end goal is freedom of speech, freedom of expression and freedom of association.”

        For good men these are mainly just tools for getting at the truth. Unfortunately these tools where present are turned against us.

        Neg said, “If you WN’s want to draw the line of humanity between “white people” on the one hand and everyone else on the other, then you should never complain when people call you “supremacist,” since you want to apply completely different moralities to different races of human beings, just like the Judaics.”


        If you have something against White Nationalism it’s hard not to suppose you have something against White people. And if you don’t have anything against White Nationalism why invent specious reasons for criticizing it?

        • “you want to apply completely different moralities to different races of human beings”

          In fact, the different races themselves construct and apply differing moralities. If there are any supremacists it would be those who deny the different races their different moralities and superimpose a single universal standard as you appear to do, Neg.

  • Why the association with these Black ladies unless the end goal is raceless?

    Anything for Trump.

  • The Huffington Post’s editorial staff are all (Jewish) women – see the photo for proof:

    Info on the founders of The Huffington Post:

    From the above Wiki article:

    “The Huffington Post (sometimes abbreviated Huff Post or HuffPo) is a politically liberal American online news aggregator and blog that has both localised and international editions founded by Arianna Huffington, Kenneth Lerer, Andrew Breitbart, and Jonah Peretti, featuring columnists.”

    Arianna Huffington: Greek, and a former “conservative” before founding Huff Post.
    Kenneth Lerer: Jewish
    Andrew Breitbart (deceased): Jewish
    Jonah Peretti: Jewish. From his Wiki article: “Peretti grew up in Oakland, California. His father is Italian-American and his mother is Jewish. His stepmother was African-American.”

    More from the above Wiki article:

    “In August 2006, The Huffington Post announced that SoftBank Capital would invest US$5 million in the site, which had grown in popularity in only a year, to help expand it. Plans included hiring more staff to update the site 24 hours a day, hiring in-house reporters and a multimedia team to make video reports. Alan Patricof’s Greycroft Partners also invested. The news marked the site’s “first round of venture capital funding.”

    From the Softbank Capital Wiki article:

    “SoftBank Capital is a venture capital group in the United States, focusing on technology and telecom early stage businesses. The firm is established and led by four partners: Ron Fisher, Eric Hippeau, Steve Murray, and Michael Perlis.”

    Ron Fisher: Jewish
    Eric Hippeau: Jewish
    Steve Murray: Jewish
    Michael Perlis: Jewish

    From Alan Patricof’s Wiki article:

    “Patricof grew up in a Jewish family on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, New York City, the son of parents who had immigrated from Russia to the United States.”

    So now you know why The Huffington Post is such total leftist, anti-White, anti-male garbage. It’s a Jewish-founded and Jewish-owned propaganda rag. Arianna Huffington is only their Gentile figurehead. It’s a 100% Jewish operation. As the saying goes, “Kick over a rock…”